Hacktoberfest 2026:維護者為十月標記出來的 issue,仍然開放、適合新手。 瀏覽 Hacktoberfest issue

PEP 399: exception to remove `io` module Python implementation `_pyio`

未關閉
#372 0 則留言 3 個 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 檢視

還沒有人認領這個 Issue。

評估

難度
5/5
預估耗時
一週以上
新手友好度
24/100
Issue 類型
功能
描述清晰度
描述清楚
活躍度
活躍
技術堆疊
python

研究方向

Start by reading the PEP 399 exception request and the linked _pyio and io implementation references. Then review the cited I/O testing infrastructure and the pull requests that show divergence between _pyio and _io. Done means the Steering Council has decided whether to grant the requested exception; this is a policy decision rather than a bounded code change.

由索引模型根據 Issue 內容生成。

描述

CPython currently contains two I/O stacks: _io written in C and _pyio written in Python. I would like a PEP 399 exception to remove _pyio.

Both are currently run in CI by some I/O specific testing infrastructure. _pyio takes significantly longer to execute the same tests, especially on older/smaller machines (ex. Raspberry Pi). I've worked to optimize it but getting faster takes significant core work.

The features needed for fast Python native I/O stacks are well represented by asyncio. In improving _pyio performance asyncio asyncio_tcp got over 10% faster. I think asyncio is representative of in-python I/O performance and has actual users.

I did an audit of open source projects and while some used to use _pyio none use it anymore. PyPy uses the native _io stack.

主要語言
Makefile
星號
182
分支
35
PR 合併指標
30 天內沒有已合併 PR

環境準備

  • 沒有 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 檔案
  • 沒有 Pull Request 範本
  • 閱讀貢獻指南

從這裡開始

  1. 先讀完整個 Issue,再讀專案的貢獻指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言說明你要接手 —— 這能避免兩個人做同樣的事。
  3. Fork 儲存庫,在一個分支上完成修改。
  4. 送出 Pull Request,並在描述裡引用這個 Issue 編號。

python/steering-council 的其他 Issue

查看 python/steering-council 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Operating Systems Issue

把新 issue 寄到你的電子郵件信箱

精選適合新手參與的 GitHub issue 摘要。