Hacktoberfest 2026:維護者為十月標記出來的 issue,仍然開放、適合新手。 瀏覽 Hacktoberfest issue

[Feature]: Improve performance by using a faster library for parsing json schemas

未關閉
#1,086 5 則留言 0 個 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 檢視

還沒有人認領這個 Issue。

評估

難度
5/5
預估耗時
一週以上
新手友好度
35/100
Issue 類型
功能
描述清晰度
基本清楚
活躍度
停滯
技術堆疊
python
領域
api, performance

研究方向

Start at the OpenAPI.from_file_path("") entry point and profile the JSON Schema validation path that currently uses jsonschema. Compare fastjsonschema and jsonschema-rs for compatibility and performance against the reported large OpenAPI case. Done means the selected library preserves existing validation behavior and demonstrates improved parsing time in the relevant tests or benchmark.

由索引模型根據 Issue 內容生成。

描述

kind/enhancement
Suggested Behavior

Use fastjsonschema instead of jsonschema, or even jsonschema-rs. jsonschema-rs claims to be 30x to 390x faster than jsonschema (3x to 7x faster than fastjsonschema).

Why is this needed?

I have an OpenAPI spec that's moderately big, roughly 1.6M and parsing it with OpenAPI takes about 15s on my computer. I unfortunately can't share it, but I can share the profiling on it.

For one-time use it would be fine, but we use it in tests to validate responses, so this adds quite a bit of runtime to tests.

References

This profiling of just loading the OpenAPI yaml file, using OpenAPI.from_file_path("<path>")

The part in blue is jsonschema.

Image

A bit more detail here: x.txt

Would you like to implement a feature?

None

主要語言
Python
星號
368
分支
140
PR 合併指標
30 天內沒有已合併 PR

貢獻指南

開啟貢獻指南

從這裡開始

  1. 先讀完整個 Issue,再讀專案的貢獻指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言說明你要接手 —— 這能避免兩個人做同樣的事。
  3. Fork 儲存庫,在一個分支上完成修改。
  4. 送出 Pull Request,並在描述裡引用這個 Issue 編號。

python-openapi/openapi-core 的其他 Issue

查看 python-openapi/openapi-core 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Python Issue

把新 issue 寄到你的電子郵件信箱

精選適合新手參與的 GitHub issue 摘要。