Compatibility with the Array API standard?
維護者通常 1 天內回覆
還沒有人認領這個 Issue。
評估
- 難度
- 5/5
- 預估耗時
- 一週以上
- 新手友好度
- 22/100
- Issue 類型
- 功能
- 描述清晰度
- 基本清楚
- 活躍度
- 活躍
- 技術堆疊
- numpy, pandas, python, pytorch, tensorflow
- 領域
- data
研究方向
The payload names no specific files, so begin by reading the Array API standard docs and choosing a few representative pvlib functions that rely on NumPy and pandas calls. Record which calls would break with other array libraries, then prototype compatibility in those functions. Done means a written cost-benefit summary with a working prototype and tests run against at least one non-NumPy array library.
由索引模型根據 Issue 內容生成。
描述
The Array API standard makes it possible to write generic code that works with many types of arrays (NumPy, Tensorflow, PyTorch, Dask, JAX, CuPy, MXNet, Xarray, ...). In principle, this would enable a pvlib simulation to be run in parallel, or on a GPU, using only code that looks very similar to the numpy-style code we are familiar with.
The Array API standard is gaining some meaningful traction in the community. For example, SciPy is adding support: see their array types tag, progress tracking tables, and developer documentation. scikit-learn is working on it too.
Adopting the standard could be a fairly straightforward way of enabling new use cases for pvlib. However, I don't have any experience with it myself and can't say anything more concrete than it seems worth looking into. So, following discussion with @echedey-ls, a good first step here is to explore the cost and benefit by prototyping compatibility in a small number of representative pvlib functions (I leave it an open question which functions might be considered representative). That would inform decisions about whether and how to pursue broader adoption across pvlib.
For reference, I copy this description from our GSoC 2025 project ideas list:
Project Title: Compatibility with the Array API
Project Description: An exciting development in the Python ecosystem is the Python array API standard, a uniform interface across the various array libraries (NumPy, Xarray, JAX, etc). Historically, pvlib has been written for compatibility with NumPy arrays and Pandas Series, but making use of the Array API to expand compatibility to other array libraries could be very beneficial. A successful proposal for this project will include some investigation about what it would take to adopt the Array API across pvlib.
Expected Outcomes: A plan/roadmap for adopting the Array API, Array API compatibility in several pvlib modules, and automated tests ensuring compatibility across the various array packages.
- 主要語言
- Python
- 星號
- 1.7k
- 分支
- 1.2k
- 平均合併
- 3 天 18 小時
- 30 天內合併 PR
- 13
環境準備
- 沒有 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 檔案
- 有 Pull Request 範本
- 閱讀貢獻指南
從這裡開始
- 先讀完整個 Issue，再讀專案的貢獻指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言說明你要接手 —— 這能避免兩個人做同樣的事。
- Fork 儲存庫，在一個分支上完成修改。
- 送出 Pull Request，並在描述裡引用這個 Issue 編號。
pvlib/pvlib-python 的其他 Issue
-
bug
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 78/100
pvlib/pvlib-python#2903 · 2 則留言 · 2 個 reaction ·
維護者通常 1 天內回覆
-
難度 1/5 1 小時以內 新手友好度 92/100
pvlib/pvlib-python#2902 ·
維護者通常 1 天內回覆
-
Add an example or documentation on using 'bhi' from ERA5可能重新可做 @anshurajbisoyi98-ctrl 於 14 天前認領，目前沒有進行中的 PR。 未關閉
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 66/100
pvlib/pvlib-python#2880 · 2 則留言 ·
維護者通常 1 天內回覆
-
Use "long-wave" rather than "infra-red" to refer to thermal radiation.可能重新可做 @Rahi-padwal 於 251 天前認領，目前沒有進行中的 PR。 未關閉api easy
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 62/100
pvlib/pvlib-python#2653 · 6 則留言 ·
維護者通常 1 天內回覆
-
question
難度 1/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 72/100
pvlib/pvlib-python#2637 · 10 則留言 ·
維護者通常 1 天內回覆
查看 pvlib/pvlib-python 的全部 Issue
相似的 Issue
-
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 88/100
NousResearch/hermes-agent#140958 ·
維護者通常 1 天內回覆
-
bisect
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 72/100
dtcxzyw/llvm-bisect-service#548 ·
-
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 82/100
sallowayma-git/IELTS-practice#248 ·
維護者通常 1 天內回覆
-
難度 1/5 1 小時以內 新手友好度 65/100
anthropics/claude-plugins-official#6763 · 10 則留言 · 10 個 reaction ·
維護者通常 3 天內回覆
-
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 85/100
維護者通常 1 天內回覆