Hacktoberfest 2026:維護者為十月標記出來的 issue,仍然開放、適合新手。 瀏覽 Hacktoberfest issue

events: addAbortListener ignores disposal and passes undefined event when signal is already aborted

未關閉
#65,637 0 則留言 0 個 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 檢視

還沒有人認領這個 Issue。

評估

難度
3/5
預估耗時
1-2 天
新手友好度
75/100
Issue 類型
缺陷
描述清晰度
描述清楚
活躍度
活躍
技術堆疊
javascript
領域
backend

研究方向

先重現提供的指令碼,然後閱讀 lib/internal/events/abort_listener.js,專注於 signal.aborted 分支和 SymbolDispose 處理。為排隊的 microtask 之前進行 disposal 以及 callback 引數新增回歸測試,接著驗證 disposal 後 listener 會被抑制,否則會接收到 abort Event。

由索引模型根據 Issue 內容生成。

描述

Version

Tested on v24.7.0, reproduces on main (commit a48e33fb6f).

Platform
All platforms (pure JS logic in `lib/internal/events/abort_listener.js`).
Subsystem

events

What steps will reproduce the bug?
'use strict';
const { addAbortListener } = require('node:events');

// --- Bug 1: Disposing the listener does not cancel it if the signal was already aborted ---
const ac = new AbortController();
ac.abort();

let listenerCalledAfterDispose = false;
{
  using _ = addAbortListener(ac.signal, (event) => {
    listenerCalledAfterDispose = true;
    console.log('Event argument received:', event); // Bug 2: logs 'undefined' instead of an Event object
  });
  // Scope exits here -> disposable[Symbol.dispose]() is invoked synchronously.
}

queueMicrotask(() => {
  console.log('Listener called after disposal:', listenerCalledAfterDispose);
  // Prints: true (Expected: false)
});
How often does it reproduce? Is there a required condition?

100% reproducible whenever addAbortListener() is called on an AbortSignal where signal.aborted === true.

What is the expected behavior? Why is that the expected behavior?
  1. Calling disposable[Symbol.dispose]() (or exiting a using scope) before the microtask executes should disarm/cancel the scheduled listener. The main motivation for addAbortListener() is TC39 explicit resource management, so disposal should always prevent the callback from firing.
  2. The listener callback should receive an Event object (type === 'abort'), consistent with when the listener is triggered by an active signal.
What do you see instead?
  1. The listener runs unconditionally in the microtask, ignoring Symbol.dispose().
  2. The listener receives undefined instead of an Event instance. Code following the documented (e) => { ... } signature that accesses properties like e.type crashes with a TypeError inside the microtask.
Additional information

In lib/internal/events/abort_listener.js:

  let removeEventListener;
  if (signal.aborted) {
    queueMicrotask ??= require('internal/process/task_queues').queueMicrotask;
    queueMicrotask(() => listener()); // <-- 1. Listener called with no argument
  } else {
    kResistStopPropagation ??= require('internal/event_target').kResistStopPropagation;
    abortListenerOptions ??= ObjectFreeze({ __proto__: null, once: true, [kResistStopPropagation]: true });
    signal.addEventListener('abort', listener, abortListenerOptions);
    removeEventListener = () => {
      signal.removeEventListener('abort', listener);
    };
  }
  return {
    __proto__: null,
    [SymbolDispose]() {
      removeEventListener?.(); // <-- 2. removeEventListener is undefined on the aborted branch
    },
  };

When signal.aborted is true:

  • removeEventListener is left undefined, making SymbolDispose a no-op.
  • queueMicrotask(() => listener()) invokes listener without passing an Event object.

A possible fix is tracking a disposed flag for the microtask and creating an Event('abort') instance:

  let removeEventListener;
  if (signal.aborted) {
    queueMicrotask ??= require('internal/process/task_queues').queueMicrotask;
    let disposed = false;
    queueMicrotask(() => {
      if (!disposed) {
        const { Event } = require('internal/event_target');
        listener(new Event('abort', { cancelable: false, bubbles: false }));
      }
    });
    removeEventListener = () => {
      disposed = true;
    };
  } else {
    // ...
主要語言
JavaScript
星號
122k
分支
37.4k
平均合併
4 天 3 小時
30 天內合併 PR
279

貢獻指南

開啟貢獻指南

從這裡開始

  1. 先讀完整個 Issue,再讀專案的貢獻指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言說明你要接手 —— 這能避免兩個人做同樣的事。
  3. Fork 儲存庫,在一個分支上完成修改。
  4. 送出 Pull Request,並在描述裡引用這個 Issue 編號。

nodejs/node 的其他 Issue

查看 nodejs/node 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 JavaScript Issue

把新 issue 寄到你的電子郵件信箱

精選適合新手參與的 GitHub issue 摘要。