Hacktoberfest 2026:維護者為十月標記出來的 issue,仍然開放、適合新手。 瀏覽 Hacktoberfest issue

Validation and filter feature

未關閉
#907 3 則留言 0 個 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 檢視

還沒有人認領這個 Issue。

評估

難度
5/5
預估耗時
一週以上
新手友好度
15/100
Issue 類型
功能
描述清晰度
需要釐清
活躍度
停滯
技術堆疊
javascript
領域
backend, frontend

研究方向

先閱讀 #882 中連結的報告,以及關於 RDF 和 SHACL 驗證的討論。釐清驗證應在前端、後端或兩者中進行,並定義 5.0.0 與 v.next 的範圍。完成的標準是就可重複使用的架構達成共識,並明確定義拒絕或篩選無效資料的需求。

由索引模型根據 Issue 內容生成。

描述

discussion priority-high revisit

There have been a number of issues reported (linked in #882) where it seems that user's data files have been corrupted. Some of these things should be fixed on the frontend, so that it makes sure invalid data is not sent. However, the backend should also check, e.g. by doing a RDF validation as suggested in #882, but we could also imagine SHACL validation, etc. If Inrupt becomes a large POD provider, it may also come with legal requirements.

Also, validation may not only be a boolean accept or error, but possibly also filtering to accept valid parts. For v.next, we need to have an architectural element that does this, but we may need to address parts of this problem already for 5.0.0.

Consider this a super-issue for discussing what should be in 5.0.0, and if we should try to make that reusable in v.next. Also, we may discuss if we do not attempt to solve it on the backend and refer to frontends to do it.

主要語言
JavaScript
星號
1.8k
分支
308
PR 合併指標
30 天內沒有已合併 PR

貢獻指南

開啟貢獻指南

從這裡開始

  1. 先讀完整個 Issue,再讀專案的貢獻指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言說明你要接手 —— 這能避免兩個人做同樣的事。
  3. Fork 儲存庫,在一個分支上完成修改。
  4. 送出 Pull Request,並在描述裡引用這個 Issue 編號。

nodeSolidServer/node-solid-server 的其他 Issue

查看 nodeSolidServer/node-solid-server 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 JavaScript Issue

把新 issue 寄到你的電子郵件信箱

精選適合新手參與的 GitHub issue 摘要。