Hacktoberfest 2026:維護者為十月標記出來的 issue,仍然開放、適合新手。 瀏覽 Hacktoberfest issue

option to not override signal handler

未關閉
#713 1 則留言 0 個 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 檢視

維護者通常 2 天內回覆

還沒有人認領這個 Issue。

評估

難度
4/5
預估耗時
3-5 天
新手友好度
35/100
Issue 類型
功能
描述清晰度
基本清楚
活躍度
停滯
技術堆疊
python
領域
backend

研究方向

從 ipykernel/kernelbase.py 中的 pre_handler_hook 開始,追蹤 dispatch_shell 如何呼叫它。確定嵌入式應用程式如何選擇不取代其 SIGINT 處理常式,然後驗證自訂處理常式仍保持不變,同時核心的正常訊號處理仍能正常運作。

由索引模型根據 Issue 內容生成。

描述

See also https://github.com/jupyter/qtconsole/issues/490

Hey there,

how can I embed qtconsole into an application without it overriding my own application's custom sigint handler?

Assume you have code that does

    std::signal(SIGINT, &handleSigInt);
    ...
    // do not initialize signal handlers
    const auto initsigs = 0;
    Py_InitializeEx(initsigs);

Then it is embedding qtconsole eventually, but at that point the sigint handler will be unset:

Thread 1 "QiTissue" hit Breakpoint 3, __interceptor_sigaction (signum=2, act=0x7fffffff8a60, oldact=0x7fffffff8b00)
    at /build/gcc/src/gcc/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_signal_interceptors.inc:55
55      in /build/gcc/src/gcc/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_signal_interceptors.inc
(gdb) bt
#0  __interceptor_sigaction(int, __sanitizer::__sanitizer_sigaction const*, __sanitizer::__sanitizer_sigaction*)
    (signum=2, act=0x7fffffff8a60, oldact=0x7fffffff8b00)
    at /build/gcc/src/gcc/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_signal_interceptors.inc:55
#1  0x00007fff5c055f0f in PyOS_setsig (sig=sig@entry=2, handler=handler@entry=0x7fff5c0b6fec <signal_handler>)
    at Python/pylifecycle.c:2536
#2  0x00007fff5c0b849f in signal_signal_impl
    (module=<optimized out>, handler=<built-in method default_int_handler of module object at remote 0x7fff51eeaa40>, signalnum=2) at ./Modules/signalmodule.c:505
#3  signal_signal (module=<optimized out>, args=<optimized out>, nargs=<optimized out>)
    at ./Modules/clinic/signalmodule.c.h:141
#4  0x00007fff5bf7bbf8 in cfunction_vectorcall_FASTCALL
    (func=<built-in method signal of module object at remote 0x7fff51eeaa40>, args=0x7fff58a24a88, nargsf=<optimized out>, kwnames=<optimized out>) at Objects/methodobject.c:426

or in python terms:

(gdb) py-bt
Traceback (most recent call first):
  <built-in method signal of module object at remote 0x7fff51eeaa40>
  File "/usr/lib/python3.9/signal.py", line 47, in signal
    handler = _signal.signal(_enum_to_int(signalnum), _enum_to_int(handler))
  File "/home/milian/.local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/ipykernel/kernelbase.py", line 280, in pre_handler_hook
    self.saved_sigint_handler = signal(SIGINT, default_int_handler)
  File "/home/milian/.local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/ipykernel/kernelbase.py", line 257, in dispatch_shell
    self.pre_handler_hook()

the kernelbase.py code seems to reset the signal handler unconditionally to some default which is highly unexpected to me:

    def pre_handler_hook(self):
        """Hook to execute before calling message handler"""
        # ensure default_int_handler during handler call
        self.saved_sigint_handler = signal(SIGINT, default_int_handler)

Is there a way to prevent this from happening?

主要語言
Python
星號
734
分支
412
平均合併
1 天 10 小時
30 天內合併 PR
12

環境準備

  • 沒有 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 檔案
  • 沒有 Pull Request 範本
  • 閱讀貢獻指南

從這裡開始

  1. 先讀完整個 Issue,再讀專案的貢獻指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言說明你要接手 —— 這能避免兩個人做同樣的事。
  3. Fork 儲存庫,在一個分支上完成修改。
  4. 送出 Pull Request,並在描述裡引用這個 Issue 編號。

ipython/ipykernel 的其他 Issue

查看 ipython/ipykernel 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Python Issue

把新 issue 寄到你的電子郵件信箱

精選適合新手參與的 GitHub issue 摘要。