[Design] Redesign the chat composer

未關閉
  • 哪裡不對？
#161 0 則留言 0 個 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 檢視

維護者通常 1 天內回覆

還沒有人認領這個 Issue。

評估

難度
5/5
預估耗時
一週以上
新手友好度
42/100
Issue 類型
功能
描述清晰度
基本清楚
活躍度
活躍
技術堆疊
typescript
領域
design, frontend

研究方向

Start at /design-audit#surfaces and the chat composer in apps/web, then compare the listed shadcn Input Group and AI Elements PromptInput references with the current behavior. Run bun test apps/web/src/chat and review the required verification commands while checking each listed visual, keyboard, draft, reference, and error state. Done means the chosen library direction is documented, Maggie approves the specimen, and existing composer behavior remains intact.

由索引模型根據 Issue 內容生成。

描述

triage/human-response

Base branch: main
Branch: maggie/redesign-chat-composer
Depends on: None

Goal

Replace the visually inconsistent chat composer shell with a polished shared composition built from proven component patterns while preserving Chopin's collaboration behavior.

Context From Planning

  • The composer in /design-audit#surfaces looks inconsistent with the rest of Chopin and should not be reinvented from scratch.
  • Investigate shadcn Input Group and AI SDK AI Elements PromptInput as references, not preselected dependencies.
  • AI Elements PromptInput is a close reference for auto-resize, submit-status icons, attachments, and keyboard behavior: https://elements.ai-sdk.dev/components/prompt-input

Current Behavior

The production composer owns acknowledged drafts, # document references, a listbox picker, send/stop state, keyboard submission, connection/read-only state, and inline send errors. Its visual shell is assembled from generic field/button classes and local layout utilities.

Desired Behavior

Create a cohesive composer with a clear input surface, footer/actions, reference affordance, busy/error presentation, and excellent keyboard/focus behavior. Reuse a library pattern where it fits, but adapt it to Chopin's existing state model.

Acceptance Criteria

  • A short library evaluation compares shadcn Input Group, AI Elements PromptInput, and adapting the current composer; it records the chosen direction and dependency cost.
  • The design audit covers empty, drafted, focused, disabled/disconnected, submitting, Planner-working/stop, reference-picker, reference-limit, and send-error states.
  • Existing acknowledged-draft behavior, # references, picker keyboard navigation, Enter/Shift-Enter behavior, submit focus restoration, stop action, and error recovery remain intact.
  • The composer is usable at narrow widths and with long referenced document names.
  • The visual shell is shared where appropriate with comment/research composers without forcing their different domain behavior into one state machine.
  • Maggie approves the audit specimen before production migration.

Verification Commands

  • bun run types
  • bun run ci
  • bun test apps/web/src/chat
  • bun run e2e

Primary Surfaces

  • /design-audit#surfaces
  • Chat composer in apps/web
  • Reference picker and acknowledged composer drafts

Expected PR Checks

  • Repo required checks

Report Requirements

  • Library comparison and decision
  • Before/after screenshots for key states and widths
  • Keyboard/accessibility evidence
  • Confirmation that draft/reference behavior is unchanged

Implementation Notes

  • Treat external components as visual/interaction references. Chopin's wire protocol and draft reconciliation remain authoritative.
  • Do not replace the composer with a component that assumes a different message or attachment model.
  • Keep send errors associated with the composer without collapsing the input layout.

Stop Conditions

  • A candidate library requires replacing Chopin's draft/reference state model.
  • Attachment scope or new composer features would expand beyond this visual redesign.
主要語言
TypeScript
星號
591
分支
33
平均合併
4 小時 13 分鐘
30 天內合併 PR
412

環境準備

  • 提供 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 檔案
  • 沒有 Pull Request 範本
  • 沒有貢獻指南

從這裡開始

  1. 先讀完整個 Issue，再讀專案的貢獻指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言說明你要接手 —— 這能避免兩個人做同樣的事。
  3. Fork 儲存庫，在一個分支上完成修改。
  4. 送出 Pull Request，並在描述裡引用這個 Issue 編號。

githubnext/chopin 的其他 Issue

查看 githubnext/chopin 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 TypeScript Issue

把新 issue 寄到你的電子郵件信箱

精選適合新手參與的 GitHub issue 摘要。