Windows: Copilot integration hardcodes `copilot.cmd`, breaking installs that ship `copilot.exe`
維護者通常 2 天內回覆
還沒有人認領這個 Issue。
評估
- 難度
- 2/5
- 預估耗時
- 1-3 小時
- 新手友好度
- 88/100
- Issue 類型
- 缺陷
- 描述清晰度
- 描述清楚
- 活躍度
- 活躍
- 技術堆疊
- python
- 領域
- cli, testing-qa
研究方向
先在 src/specify_cli/integrations/copilot/init.py 中閱讀 _copilot_executable() 和 _resolve_executable(),然後執行 tests/integrations/test_extra_args.py 中現有的涵蓋測試。為只包含 copilot.exe 的 Windows PATH 新增回歸涵蓋測試,並在命令分派能解析已安裝的可執行檔,而不是假設為 copilot.cmd 時,視為該 issue 已完成。
由索引模型根據 Issue 內容生成。
描述
Bug Description
CopilotIntegration._resolve_executable() falls back to a hardcoded, platform-guessed executable name on Windows (copilot.cmd) instead of detecting what's actually installed. When the GitHub Copilot CLI is installed in a way that produces copilot.exe rather than an npm-style .cmd shim, workflow/command dispatch to the copilot integration fails outright on Windows, because Spec Kit never looks for the actual executable on PATH.
Steps to Reproduce
- On Windows, install the Copilot CLI via a distribution that produces
copilot.exeonPATH(not an npm global-install shim producingcopilot.cmd). - Run any Spec Kit workflow/command step with
integration: copilot(e.g.specify workflow run ...). - Dispatch fails because Specify attempts to invoke
copilot.cmd, which does not exist, instead of thecopilot.exethat is actually onPATH.
Expected Behavior
Spec Kit should detect the actual Copilot CLI executable available on the user's PATH on Windows, rather than assuming a single fixed name.
Actual Behavior
Specify attempts to invoke copilot.cmd even when only copilot.exe is installed on PATH, so workflow/command dispatch fails.
Specify CLI Version
1.0.7 (as encountered; likely affects other versions using the same _copilot_executable() logic)
AI Agent
GitHub Copilot
Operating System
Windows (version not specified)
Python Version
N/A (not provided)
Error Logs
N/A (no specific error output provided)
Additional Context
Where: src/specify_cli/integrations/copilot/__init__.py
def _copilot_executable() -> str:
"""Return the executable name for Copilot CLI on this platform.
On Windows, subprocess invocation is reliable with `copilot.cmd`.
"""
if os.name == "nt":
return "copilot.cmd"
return "copilot"
def _resolve_executable(self) -> str:
"""Return the Copilot CLI executable, respecting the env-var override.
Checks ``SPECKIT_INTEGRATION_COPILOT_EXECUTABLE`` first. Falls
back to the platform-specific default from ``_copilot_executable()``
(``copilot.cmd`` on Windows, ``copilot`` elsewhere) so that
existing behaviour is preserved when the env var is unset.
"""
env_name = "SPECKIT_INTEGRATION_COPILOT_EXECUTABLE"
override = os.environ.get(env_name, "").strip()
return override if override else _copilot_executable()
Why this likely wasn't caught earlier:
- Workflow command-step dispatch is a newer code path. Most integration scaffolding (init, command registration, writing
.github//.claude/files) never has to spawn the Copilot CLI as a subprocess._resolve_executable()/build_exec_args()only matter once something actually shells out tocopilot, which is essentially exclusive tospecify workflow runcommand steps — so long-time Spec Kit + Copilot users could easily never exercise this path. - The hardcoded
copilot.cmdguess suggests testing only covered an npm global install (npm install -g @github/copilotor similar), which npm wraps in a.cmdshim on Windows by convention. Installing the Copilot CLI via a different channel (standalone installer,winget,scoop, a signed native binary, etc.) produces a realcopilot.exeonPATHinstead, and hits this bug immediately and reliably. If most Windows testers install via npm, this simply never surfaces for them. - The
SPECKIT_INTEGRATION_COPILOT_EXECUTABLEoverride itself appears recently added (per its own docstring: "so that existing behaviour is preserved when the env var is unset"), suggesting this is a known, actively-being-patched rough edge rather than a long-stable path.
Net: this only surfaces at the intersection of (a) workflows that dispatch to Copilot as a subprocess, (b) Windows, and (c) a non-npm Copilot CLI install — a narrow combination most contributors/testers may not sit in.
Suggested fix:
def _copilot_executable() -> str:
"""Return the executable name for Copilot CLI on this platform."""
if os.name != "nt":
return "copilot"
for candidate in ("copilot.exe", "copilot.cmd", "copilot"):
if shutil.which(candidate):
return candidate
# Nothing found on PATH — keep the historical default so the
# resulting "command not found" error still references the
# previously expected name.
return "copilot.cmd"
shutil is already imported in this module, so this requires no new dependency. Suggest adding a regression test alongside the existing _resolve_executable/build_exec_args coverage in tests/integrations/test_extra_args.py, mocking shutil.which to simulate a Windows install exposing only copilot.exe.
Workaround: SPECKIT_INTEGRATION_COPILOT_EXECUTABLE already exists and can be set to copilot.exe explicitly, scoped to the invoking process, until this is fixed upstream.
AI Disclosure
GitHub Copilot (GPT-6 Sol) organized the user-provided issue text into the repository's bug-report template and filed it. Human-directed; no independent reproduction or code changes. Reasoning-effort setting not provided.
- 主要語言
- Python
- 星號
- 138k
- 分支
- 12.4k
- 平均合併
- 2 天 11 小時
- 30 天內合併 PR
- 163
環境準備
從這裡開始
- 先讀完整個 Issue,再讀專案的貢獻指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言說明你要接手 —— 這能避免兩個人做同樣的事。
- Fork 儲存庫,在一個分支上完成修改。
- 送出 Pull Request,並在描述裡引用這個 Issue 編號。
github/spec-kit 的其他 Issue
-
triage-nice-to-have
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 88/100
維護者通常 2 天內回覆
-
enhancement needs-triage triage-can-wait
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 65/100
github/spec-kit#4627 · 3 則留言 ·
維護者通常 2 天內回覆
-
needs-triage triage-nice-to-have
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 72/100
github/spec-kit#4527 · 1 則留言 ·
維護者通常 2 天內回覆
-
bug-assess severity-medium
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 72/100
github/spec-kit#4273 · 3 則留言 ·
維護者通常 2 天內回覆
-
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 84/100
維護者通常 2 天內回覆
相似的 Issue
-
pydanty:is-working
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 78/100
pydantic/pydantic-ai#8843 ·
維護者通常 1 天內回覆
-
breaking change enhancement server
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 72/100
維護者通常 1 天內回覆
-
bug
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 88/100
維護者通常 1 天內回覆
-
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 72/100
維護者通常 1 天內回覆
-
needs-triage
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 85/100
維護者通常 1 天內回覆