Hacktoberfest 2026:維護者為十月標記出來的 issue,仍然開放、適合新手。 瀏覽 Hacktoberfest issue

list_pull_requests / search_pull_requests: expose review decision + combined CI status as optional fields

未關閉
#3,287 1 則留言 0 個 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 檢視

維護者通常 1 天內回覆

@dawNotPoi 已經在處理了。

開始於 2026年9月25日。

  • #3335 來自 @dawNotPoi —— 未關閉

評估

難度
3/5
預估耗時
1-2 天
新手友好度
68/100
Issue 類型
功能
描述清晰度
基本清楚
活躍度
活躍
技術堆疊
github, go
領域
api, tooling

研究方向

從 list_pull_requests 和 search_pull_requests 入口開始,然後將它們的欄位允許清單與 pull_request_read 作業 get_reviews 和 get_status 進行比較。當兩個列出工具都能選擇性地回傳 review_decision 和 status_check_rollup,因而無需針對每個 PR 進行後續呼叫即可提供所要求的 PR 摘要時,即表示完成。

由索引模型根據 Issue 內容生成。

描述

enhancement request ai review
Describe the feature or problem you’d like to solve

list_pull_requests and search_pull_requests return rich per-PR metadata (state, draft, mergeable_state, timestamps, etc.) but neither exposes the PR's review decision (approved / changes requested / review required) or its combined CI/check status. Getting either today requires a separate pull_request_read call per PR (method: get_reviews and/or get_status), which doesn't scale: summarizing N open PRs costs one bulk listing call plus up to 2×N follow-up calls.

Proposed solution

Add optional fields to list_pull_requests's (and search_pull_requests's) fields allow-list:

  • review_decision: the PR's overall review decision (APPROVED, CHANGES_REQUESTED, REVIEW_REQUIRED, or null) — equivalent to GitHub's GraphQL reviewDecision field, already used by gh pr list --json reviewDecision.
  • status_check_rollup (or similar): the combined CI/check status for the PR's head commit — equivalent to GitHub's GraphQL statusCheckRollup field, already used by gh pr list --json statusCheckRollup.

With these available, a single list_pull_requests call per repository would be enough to classify PRs into buckets like "needs review", "blocked/CI failing", "approved and green", etc. — removing the need for any per-PR follow-up call in the common case.

Example prompts or workflows (for tools/toolsets only)
  • "Give me a one-table summary of every open PR across these repos: link, title, review status, CI status" — currently requires 1 + 2N calls; with these fields, a single list_pull_requests call per repo would suffice.
  • Daily/weekly PR digest bots that bucket PRs into categories (needs review / blocked / ready to merge / stale) across many repositories.
  • Dashboards needing an at-a-glance "is this PR green and approved?" signal for a large PR backlog without pulling full review/check-run detail for each one.
Additional context

This mirrors what GitHub's own CLI (gh pr list --json reviewDecision,statusCheckRollup,...) already exposes in one compact call per repo. An automation agent using only the current MCP tools had to make one list_pull_requests call plus 2 pull_request_read calls per PR just to get this same information, and the resulting accumulated context (~215KB across ~80 calls for 36 PRs) was enough to make the agent's next reasoning step time out. Exposing these two fields directly on the listing/search tools would remove the need for that fan-out entirely for this class of use case.

主要語言
Go
星號
33.3k
分支
5.1k
平均合併
22 小時 46 分鐘
30 天內合併 PR
17

環境準備

從這裡開始

  1. 先讀完整個 Issue,再讀專案的貢獻指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言說明你要接手 —— 這能避免兩個人做同樣的事。
  3. Fork 儲存庫,在一個分支上完成修改。
  4. 送出 Pull Request,並在描述裡引用這個 Issue 編號。

github/github-mcp-server 的其他 Issue

查看 github/github-mcp-server 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Go Issue

把新 issue 寄到你的電子郵件信箱

精選適合新手參與的 GitHub issue 摘要。