Hacktoberfest 2026:維護者為十月標記出來的 issue,仍然開放、適合新手。 瀏覽 Hacktoberfest issue

mcp diff

未關閉
#2,942 0 則留言 0 個 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 檢視

維護者通常 4 天內回覆

還沒有人認領這個 Issue。

評估

難度
4/5
預估耗時
3-5 天
新手友好度
48/100
Issue 類型
功能
描述清晰度
基本清楚
活躍度
冷清
技術堆疊
go
領域
testing, tooling

研究方向

從 mcp-diff.yml 中的註解開始,檢查現有的 mcp-server-diff 靜態檢查。查看 issue #1877 和 #2417,了解其中描述的 strict-mode 行為,然後使用提議的用戶端到伺服器工作階段模型評估一個 replay 步驟。完成的標準是該檢查能夠報告行為差異,例如欄位被捨棄或錯誤發生變更,並且已了解其執行階段成本。

由索引模型根據 Issue 內容生成。

描述

request ai review

the comment in mcp-diff.yml about keeping the go-sdk v1.6.1 to v1.7.0-pre.1 bump "an honest, signal-only diff" is the right instinct, and i think there's a natural second half to it.

a schema diff answers "did the declared tool surface change". #1877 and #2417 are the case where that isn't enough: inputs got silently stripped from actions_run_trigger under OpenAI strict mode, so the declared schema and the shape a strict client actually received had diverged. the tool list looked stable, what models could do with it wasn't.

the complementary check is behavioural. record one client to server session as an ordered list of tool calls and results, replay it against the bumped SDK, diff. that catches the layer a schema comparison structurally can't see: strict-mode coercions, dropped optional fields, changed error shapes, transport-level omissions.

disclosure: i maintain an open source tool that does the replay half (reelier, MIT, github.com/seldonframe/reelier). to be clear about ordering, the static diff is the cheaper gate and should stay first, this is a complement to mcp-server-diff rather than a replacement. happy to open a PR adding a replay step so you can see whether it earns its runtime, and to close it if it doesn't.

主要語言
Go
星號
33.4k
分支
5.1k
平均合併
3 天 8 分鐘
30 天內合併 PR
36

環境準備

從這裡開始

  1. 先讀完整個 Issue,再讀專案的貢獻指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言說明你要接手 —— 這能避免兩個人做同樣的事。
  3. Fork 儲存庫,在一個分支上完成修改。
  4. 送出 Pull Request,並在描述裡引用這個 Issue 編號。

github/github-mcp-server 的其他 Issue

查看 github/github-mcp-server 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Go Issue

把新 issue 寄到你的電子郵件信箱

精選適合新手參與的 GitHub issue 摘要。