Hacktoberfest 2026:維護者為十月標記出來的 issue,仍然開放、適合新手。 瀏覽 Hacktoberfest issue

`add_issue_comment`, `update_issue`, and `get_issue` reject valid integer `issue_number`

未關閉
#2,807 2 則留言 0 個 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 檢視

維護者通常 1 天內回覆

還沒有人認領這個 Issue。

評估

難度
3/5
預估耗時
1-2 天
新手友好度
68/100
Issue 類型
缺陷
描述清晰度
基本清楚
活躍度
活躍
技術堆疊
go
領域
api, backend

研究方向

從 add_issue_comment、update_issue 和 get_issue 的實作及請求驗證路徑入手,重點關注將 issue_number 插值到 URL 路徑中。使用整數重現這些呼叫,並將其與 milestone 之類的正常運作整數參數進行比較。完成標準是 issue_number 的整數值能夠通過驗證並到達相應的 GitHub REST 端點,且三個工具都有回歸測試涵蓋。

由索引模型根據 Issue 內容生成。

描述

bug request ai review
Summary

Three endpoints that take issue_number as a required parameter consistently fail when invoked with an integer, even though the tool schema declares issue_number as number. Other endpoints on the same server that take integer parameters work correctly, and the failure survives reconnecting the MCP server.

Affected tools
  • add_issue_comment
  • update_issue
  • get_issue
Unaffected tools (for comparison, same session, same repo, same auth)
  • create_issue — succeeds (does not take issue_number)
  • list_issues, search_issues — succeed
  • create_branch, create_or_update_file, push_files, create_pull_request — all succeed, including calls with integer fields like milestone
Reproduction
  1. Any repo the caller can write issues on.
  2. Call, e.g.:
    {
      "tool": "add_issue_comment",
      "arguments": {
        "owner": "<owner>",
        "repo": "<repo>",
        "issue_number": 11,
        "body": "test"
      }
    }
    
  3. Call fails. Retrying multiple times, including after fully reconnecting the MCP server, reproduces the failure.
  4. create_issue against the same repo in the same session succeeds, ruling out auth, permissions, and rate limiting.
  5. Reproduced across at least two independent sessions on the same day.
Expected

Comment is posted / issue is updated / issue is fetched, matching a direct REST call to POST /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{issue_number}/comments (etc.).

Actual

Call is rejected before it reaches GitHub. The failure pattern is consistent with issue_number being serialised as a string somewhere in the request pipeline and then rejected by the server's own integer validation.

[TODO fill in with error string on next occurrence]

Hypothesis

The three broken endpoints are exactly the ones where issue_number is templated into a URL path segment (/repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{issue_number}[/comments]), whereas the working endpoints pass their integers in the request body or query string. Likely culprits:

  • A path-parameter substitution step stringifies the value before an internal validator runs.
  • A schema-validation layer runs after path substitution and sees a string where a number is required.

Anywhere issue_number is interpolated into a URL is worth checking first.

Affected version
  • MCP server: GitHub MCP http server
  • Transport: stdio.
  • Client: custom provider

Please run docker run -i --rm ghcr.io/github/github-mcp-server ./github-mcp-server --version and paste the output below

Workaround

None from the client side; the caller cannot influence how the server serialises the parameter. Affected users have to fall back to the GitHub REST API directly or edit the issue in the web UI.

主要語言
Go
星號
33.3k
分支
5.1k
平均合併
1 天 1 小時
30 天內合併 PR
19

環境準備

從這裡開始

  1. 先讀完整個 Issue,再讀專案的貢獻指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言說明你要接手 —— 這能避免兩個人做同樣的事。
  3. Fork 儲存庫,在一個分支上完成修改。
  4. 送出 Pull Request,並在描述裡引用這個 Issue 編號。

github/github-mcp-server 的其他 Issue

查看 github/github-mcp-server 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Go Issue

把新 issue 寄到你的電子郵件信箱

精選適合新手參與的 GitHub issue 摘要。