Hacktoberfest 2026:維護者為十月標記出來的 issue,仍然開放、適合新手。 瀏覽 Hacktoberfest issue

link doesn't recognize a branch's existing merged/closed PR, tries to create a duplicate

未關閉
#373 0 則留言 1 個 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 檢視

還沒有人認領這個 Issue。

評估

難度
3/5
預估耗時
1-2 天
新手友好度
66/100
Issue 類型
缺陷
描述清晰度
基本清楚
活躍度
冷清
技術堆疊
github, go
領域
api, cli

研究方向

從 gh stack link 入口開始,追蹤在呼叫 createPullRequest 之前對現有 PR 的查找流程。使用已合併和已關閉的分支進行重現,然後與 gh pr list --head <branch> --state all 比較。完成標準是能夠辨識任何狀態的現有 PR,且不會嘗試重複建立。

由索引模型根據 Issue 內容生成。

描述

bug topic: cli - link

Summary

gh stack link looks up an existing PR for each branch argument, but the lookup appears scoped to open PRs only. For a branch whose PR already merged or was closed (unmerged), link reports no PR found and attempts to create a new one — contradicting the documented additive-only design ("existing PRs are never removed").

Repro

  1. Build a stack main <- a <- b <- c <- d <- e via gh stack link.
  2. Merge a and b. Close c without merging (its content landed elsewhere, or it was abandoned).
  3. Later, run gh stack link again with the full historical branch list (e.g. to fix d's base after c closed):
    gh stack link a b c d e --base main

Actual

Checking existing stacks...
Pushing N branches to origin...
Looking up PRs for 5 branches...
Found PR #.. for branch d
Found PR #.. for branch e
Creating 3 PRs...
✗ failed to create PR for branch a: creating PR: GraphQL: was submitted too quickly, Head sha can't be blank, Base sha can't be blank, No commits between main and a, Head ref must be a branch (createPullRequest)

Only the still-open branches (d, e) were recognized as "Found PR". The merged branch a (whose content is already in main, hence "No commits between main and a") and the closed branch c were both treated as PR-less and queued for creation.

In my case the create call failed immediately on the first attempt (an already-merged branch has no diff vs. its base, so createPullRequest rejects it), so no duplicate PR was actually created — I confirmed this via gh pr list --head <branch> --state all for each affected branch afterward. But this looks like it depends on the specific branch/repo state; a branch that still has some diff against the base (e.g. a closed-but-unmerged PR whose branch wasn't cleaned up) would likely succeed in creating a genuine duplicate PR.

Expected

link's PR lookup should match a branch's PR regardless of state (open, closed, or merged) before deciding whether to create a new one, consistent with the "existing PRs are never removed" behavior documented for this command.

Environment

gh-stack version 0.0.8, installed via gh extension install github/gh-stack.

Related: #372 (same investigation session, different symptom of the same overall stack-mutation scenario — see also the atomicity issue I'm filing separately).

主要語言
Go
星號
1.5k
分支
73
平均合併
1 天 8 小時
30 天內合併 PR
5

貢獻指南

開啟貢獻指南

從這裡開始

  1. 先讀完整個 Issue,再讀專案的貢獻指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言說明你要接手 —— 這能避免兩個人做同樣的事。
  3. Fork 儲存庫,在一個分支上完成修改。
  4. 送出 Pull Request,並在描述裡引用這個 Issue 編號。

github/gh-stack 的其他 Issue

查看 github/gh-stack 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Go Issue

把新 issue 寄到你的電子郵件信箱

精選適合新手參與的 GitHub issue 摘要。