C# build targets duplicate the Copilot CLI bundle per source path: no shared cache, archive kept, payload copied twice
還沒有人認領這個 Issue。
評估
- 難度
- 4/5
- 預估耗時
- 3-5 天
- 新手友好度
- 45/100
- Issue 類型
- 缺陷
- 描述清晰度
- 描述清楚
- 活躍度
- 活躍
- 技術堆疊
- csharp
- 領域
- backend, build-system
研究方向
Start with build/GitHub.Copilot.SDK.targets in the NuGet package; inspect how _CopilotCacheDir, the archive download and extraction, and native payload staging are defined. Reproduce with the two source paths in the issue and compare archive and output contents. Done when repeated builds avoid the reported duplicate storage while still providing the required native files to each app.
由索引模型根據 Issue 內容生成。
描述
Summary
The GitHub.Copilot.SDK MSBuild targets cache the downloaded Copilot CLI bundle under
$(IntermediateOutputPath)copilot-cli/<version>/<platform>/. Because the intermediate output path of a
.NET 10 file-based app (dotnet run app.cs) is a per-source-path directory in the user's runfile cache,
every distinct source path re-downloads and re-extracts the CLI bundle. Nothing is shared between
entries, so identical bytes are duplicated once per path.
On a machine where a test harness ran the same app from many temporary directories, this produced
~1,400 copies of the same 84 MB archive and its extracted payload — 755 GB.
This is the SDK-package half of a larger report; the file-based-app cache-keying half is filed at
dotnet/sdk#56940.
Environment
GitHub.Copilot.SDK 1.0.26 (CopilotCliVersion 1.0.103)
.NET SDK 10.0.402
macOS 26 (arm64), APFS
~/.nuget/packages/github.copilot.sdk/1.0.26/build/GitHub.Copilot.SDK.targets:
<_CopilotCacheDir>$(IntermediateOutputPath)copilot-cli\$(CopilotCliVersion)\$(_CopilotPlatform)</_CopilotCacheDir>
<_CopilotArchivePath>$(_CopilotCacheDir)\copilot.tgz</_CopilotArchivePath>
...
<DownloadFile SourceUrl="$(_CopilotChecksumsUrl)" DestinationFolder="$(_CopilotCacheDir)" ... />
<DownloadFile SourceUrl="$(_CopilotDownloadUrl)" DestinationFolder="$(_CopilotCacheDir)" DestinationFileName="copilot.tgz" ... />
<Exec Command=""$(_TarCommand)" -xzf "$(_CopilotArchivePath)" --strip-components=1 -C "$(_CopilotCacheDir)"" ... />
The cache is scoped to IntermediateOutputPath, which is scoped to the project — and for a file-based
app the project is per source path.
Reproduction
// repro.cs
#:package [email protected]
Console.WriteLine("repro");
CACHE="$HOME/Library/Application Support/dotnet/runfile"
mkdir -p /tmp/rfr/a /tmp/rfr/b
cp repro.cs /tmp/rfr/a/ && cp repro.cs /tmp/rfr/b/ # byte-identical
(cd /tmp/rfr/a && dotnet run repro.cs) # cold: 4.4s, creates repro-<hash A>
(cd /tmp/rfr/a && dotnet run repro.cs) # warm: 0.14s, no new directory
(cd /tmp/rfr/b && dotnet run repro.cs) # cold again: 4.7s, creates repro-<hash B>
Both cache directories are 546 MB. The archive is byte-identical in both, and physically duplicated:
$ stat -f 'inode=%i links=%l size=%z' \
$CACHE/repro-552f7c…/obj/debug/copilot-cli/1.0.103/darwin-arm64/copilot.tgz \
$CACHE/repro-16b020…/obj/debug/copilot-cli/1.0.103/darwin-arm64/copilot.tgz
inode=96355505 links=1 size=83944573 …/repro-552f7c…/copilot.tgz
inode=96356143 links=1 size=83944573 …/repro-16b020…/copilot.tgz
$ shasum -a 256 …/repro-552f7c…/copilot.tgz …/repro-16b020…/copilot.tgz
4cba81686f2d4a56e2ea2e1bd1cdde303d07f28de11593e1db1786f1219b8f74 …/repro-552f7c…/copilot.tgz
4cba81686f2d4a56e2ea2e1bd1cdde303d07f28de11593e1db1786f1219b8f74 …/repro-16b020…/copilot.tgz
Per-artifact cost breakdown (one cold build, 546 MB)
284 MB obj/debug/copilot-cli/1.0.103/darwin-arm64/
81 MB copilot.tgz (the downloaded archive, kept after extraction)
98 MB prebuilds/darwin-arm64/runtime.node
15 MB foundry-local-sdk/…/libfoundry_local.dylib
12 MB prebuilds/darwin-arm64/libOneAuthInterop.dylib
261 MB bin/debug/runtimes/osx-arm64/native/
98 MB runtime.node
98 MB libcopilot_runtime.dylib
12 MB libOneAuthInterop.dylib
18 MB bin/debug/GitHub.Copilot.SDK.dll
0.3 MB the app's own dll + pdb
Two further observations from the same measurement:
bin/debug/runtimes/osx-arm64/native/runtime.nodeandlibcopilot_runtime.dylibare the same
file. Both are 98 MB withsha256 70280452e26d03c3b6bd77b47510460b70416e0e421eac336c134a397a964fc8
andlinks=1— the same payload is copied twice into one output directory. The targets comment says
the cdylib is "renamed from the tarball's napi-style prebuilds//runtime.node", so this looks
like both the original name and the renamed copy surviving.copilot.tgzis kept after extraction (81 MB). The extraction target never deletes it, so the
archive is retained in every cache directory alongside the extracted tree it produced.
So even a single, correctly reused artifact directory holds the payload roughly three times over
(obj/…/prebuilds/runtime.node, bin/…/runtime.node, bin/…/libcopilot_runtime.dylib), plus the
archive.
Workaround
Setting ArtifactsPath keeps the build output out of the shared cache:
dotnet run repro.cs --artifacts-path /tmp/scratch
This does work — build output lands under /tmp/scratch — but the runfile cache still gains an ~84 KB
stub directory per source path (csc.rsp, build-start.cache, build-success.cache), so it is a
mitigation rather than a fix.
Possible directions
- Cache the download under a location keyed by
CopilotCliVersion+ platform only (e.g. under
$(NuGetPackageRoot)or a per-user CLI cache), and have each project's intermediate output link or
copy from there. The archive and extracted payload are identical for every consumer of the same
version. - Delete
copilot.tgzafter successful extraction. - Avoid emitting the same 98 MB payload under both
runtime.nodeandlibcopilot_runtime.dylibin the
same output directory. - Prefer hard links (or a copy-if-newer that preserves them) when staging the bundle into the output
directory.
Impact
A five-line app referencing this package costs 546 MB of build output per distinct source path. That is
survivable for a normal project, but a test harness, CI matrix, or agent sandbox that generates a fresh
directory per case turns it into unbounded disk growth: ~1,400 directories, 755 GB on the machine this
was measured on.
- 主要語言
- Java
- 星號
- 10.7k
- 分支
- 1.5k
- PR 合併指標
- 30 天內沒有已合併 PR
環境準備
- 沒有 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 檔案
- 沒有 Pull Request 範本
- 閱讀貢獻指南
從這裡開始
- 先讀完整個 Issue,再讀專案的貢獻指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言說明你要接手 —— 這能避免兩個人做同樣的事。
- Fork 儲存庫,在一個分支上完成修改。
- 送出 Pull Request,並在描述裡引用這個 Issue 編號。
github/copilot-sdk 的其他 Issue
-
Rust: ElicitationRequest drops the tool call id from elicitation.requested可能重新可做 關聯的 PR 已關閉且未合併。 未關閉
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 78/100
github/copilot-sdk#2900 ·
-
難度 1/5 1 小時以內 新手友好度 84/100
github/copilot-sdk#2876 · 1 則留言 · 1 個 reaction ·
-
Python ModelLimits drops max_output_tokens from model metadata可能重新可做 關聯的 PR 已關閉且未合併。 未關閉bug
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 78/100
github/copilot-sdk#2798 · 1 則留言 ·
-
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 65/100
github/copilot-sdk#2759 ·
-
docs/AGENTS.md is repo authoring guidance, but everything in docs/ gets published可能重新可做 關聯的 PR 已關閉且未合併。 未關閉documentation
難度 1/5 1 小時以內 新手友好度 85/100
github/copilot-sdk#2758 ·
查看 github/copilot-sdk 的全部 Issue
相似的 Issue
-
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 72/100
aws/serverless-java-container#1729 ·
維護者通常 1 天內回覆
-
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 75/100
維護者通常 1 天內回覆
-
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 75/100
ls1intum/thesis-management#1473 ·
維護者通常 1 天內回覆
-
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 76/100
LunaDeerMC/Dominion#301 · 1 則留言 ·
-
[FEATURE] Expose external refresh, node-level translog and warmer stats可能已有人在做 關聯的 PR 仍在進行中或已合併。 未關閉untriaged
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 68/100
opensearch-project/opensearch-prometheus-exporter#680 ·
維護者通常 2 天內回覆