com.google.firebase.auth.UserRecord.CreateRequest doesn't override .equals making it hard to test

首先定位 com.google.firebase.auth.UserRecord.CreateRequest 與進入點 createUserAsync(CreateRequest request)。檢視現有的驗證測試，然後確認具有相同 payload 的兩個請求是否如預期進行比較，以及基於 Mockito 的測試是否不再收到 null 結果。

[READ] Step 1: Are you in the right place?

• For issues or feature requests related to the code in this repository
  file a Github issue.
  • If this is a feature request make sure the issue title starts with "FR:".
• For general technical questions, post a question on StackOverflow
  with the firebase tag.
• For general Firebase discussion, use the firebase-talk
  google group.
• For help troubleshooting your application that does not fall under one
  of the above categories, reach out to the personalized
  Firebase support channel.

[REQUIRED] Step 2: Describe your environment

• Operating System version: _____
• Firebase SDK version: _____
• Library version: _____
• Firebase Product: _____ (auth, database, storage, etc)

[REQUIRED] Step 3: Describe the problem

Steps to reproduce:

What happened? How can we make the problem occur?
This could be a description, log/console output, etc.

Relevant Code:

// TODO(you): code here to reproduce the problem

I built an application with a function that call firebaseAuth.createUserAsync(CreateRequest request). To test the logic in this function, I created a unit test for it with a mock:

CreateRequest createRequest = // creates some request
UserRecord userRecord = // build a record

FirebaseAuth auth = mock(FirebaseAuth.class);
when(auth.createUserAsync(createRequest)).thenReturn(ApiFutures.immediateFuture(userRecord))

but when I ran the test I got a Null Pointer Exception from Mockito. On further inspection, I realized that two instances of CreateRequest with the same payload value return false when compared via .equals. This leads Mockito to think the function is not defined for this argument.

I am happy to contribute this simple (probably IntelliJ-generated) code, is there a reason you don't want this in there?