Hacktoberfest 2026:維護者為十月標記出來的 issue,仍然開放、適合新手。 瀏覽 Hacktoberfest issue

Slow download speeds compared to Statement Execution API

未關閉
#502 1 則留言 0 個 reaction 已指派 1 人 在 GitHub 檢視

@jayantsing-db 已經在處理了。

開始於 2025年3月10日。

評估

這個 Issue 還沒有評估資料。

描述

Context

I've been exploring different ways of getting large amounts of data (100GB+) out of Unity Catalog and into external ray clusters for distributed ml model training and while assessing databricks-sql-python, noticed the download speeds are significantly slower than using the statement execution API. In the actual external ray cluster, the difference is 10x, however I was able to also replicate this to a lesser extent in a databricks notebook.

Replication

The first two approaches both lead to a ~45MB/s download speed on an i3.4xlarge

Using databricks-sql-python directly
from databricks.sql import connect

with connect(
    server_hostname="same-host",
    http_path="same-http-path",
    access_token="token",
    use_cloud_fetch=True,
) as connection:
    cursor = connection.cursor()
    cursor.execute(
        "SELECT * from foo.bar.baz"
    )
    print(cursor.fetchall_arrow())
Using databricks-sql-python + ray.data.read_sql

reference: https://docs.ray.io/en/latest/data/api/doc/ray.data.read_sql.html#ray.data.read_sql

from databricks.sql import connect
from ray.data import read_sql

import ray

ray.init(num_cpu=16)

def connection_factory():
    return connect(
        server_hostname="same-host",
        http_path="same-http-path",
        access_token="token"
        use_cloud_fetch=True,
    )

ray_dataset = read_sql(
    sql="SELECT * from foo.bar.baz",
    connection_factory=connection_factory,
    override_num_blocks=1,
    ray_remote_args={"num_cpus": 16},
)
print(f"Ray dataset count: {ray_dataset.count()}")

However when I use ray.data.read_databricks_tables, I can reach download speeds of ~150MB/s on the same machine.

Using ray.data.read_databricks_tables
import os
import ray

from ray.data import read_databricks_tables


ray.init(num_cpus=16)


os.environ["DATABRICKS_TOKEN"] = "token"
os.environ["DATABRICKS_HOST"] = "same-host"
ray_dataset = read_databricks_tables(
    warehouse_id="same-id-in-http-path-above",
    catalog="foo",
    schema="bar",
    query="SELECT * from baz",
)
print(f"Ray dataset size: {ray_dataset.size_bytes()}")
print(f"Ray dataset count: {ray_dataset.count()}")
print(
    f"Ray dataset summed: {ray_dataset.sum('some_column')}"
)

Potential Cause

I suspect this is because the statement execution api allows you to make separate parallel requests to retrieve different "chunks" of data vs how the sql connector adopts a cursor based approach where you can only retrieve data sequentially.

Ask

Are there any plans on supporting a similar chunking pattern for databricks-sql-python and in lieu of that, is there currently any way to reach download speed parity with the statement execution api?
databricks-sql-python is great because it does not have the 100GB limit of the statement execution api but the slow download speed is a major blocker for use in ml applications requiring the transfer of large data, which to be fair may not the use case that databricks-sql-python has been designed for.

主要語言
Python
星號
233
分支
152
平均合併
21 小時 5 分鐘
30 天內合併 PR
10

貢獻指南

開啟貢獻指南

從這裡開始

  1. 先讀完整個 Issue,再讀專案的貢獻指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言說明你要接手 —— 這能避免兩個人做同樣的事。
  3. Fork 儲存庫,在一個分支上完成修改。
  4. 送出 Pull Request,並在描述裡引用這個 Issue 編號。

databricks/databricks-sql-python 的其他 Issue

查看 databricks/databricks-sql-python 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Python Issue

把新 issue 寄到你的電子郵件信箱

精選適合新手參與的 GitHub issue 摘要。