Build outputs shared by several languages are reported under one of them; outputs of a build system hide the language-wide ones

未關閉
#145 0 則留言 0 個 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 檢視

維護者通常 1 天內回覆

還沒有人認領這個 Issue。

評估

難度
4/5
預估耗時
3-5 天
新手友好度
40/100
Issue 類型
功能
描述清晰度
基本清楚
活躍度
活躍
技術堆疊
elixir, erlang, java, kotlin, python

研究方向

Start by reading outputs_of in facts/outputs.py and tracing how CommittedOutput facts are grouped for reporting. Compare the BEAM and JVM cases described in the issue, including tests/fixtures/bare_beam. Decide whether shared outputs should be reported under each owning language or once per ecosystem, and whether build system outputs should add to language wide outputs; done means both behaviors are covered by clear, consistent results.

由索引模型根據 Issue 內容生成。

描述

committed-artifacts and vcs-ignore answer per language, and a BuildOutput of several languages is reported under one of them. BEAM's _build/ and erl_crash.dump are outputs of both Elixir and Erlang; in tests/fixtures/bare_beam (both languages) the check says

Elixir: no build outputs are committed; Erlang: 2 build outputs are committed

although the committed _build/ is Elixir's too (JVM's shared outputs behave the same for Java and Kotlin). The CommittedOutput fact carries every language; it is the answer's grouping that picks one. An output shared by the languages of one ecosystem would read better reported once, under the ecosystem, or under every language that owns it.

Related: outputs_of (facts/outputs.py) returns the outputs tied to the build systems in use or, only when none is, the language-wide ones. A profile that ties one output to a build system therefore hides its language-wide outputs for that build system (BEAM had to leave deps/ untied so _build/ still counted for Elixir; JVM's *.class output is hidden whenever Maven or Gradle is used). Is that precedence intended, or should the two sets add up?

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

https://claude.ai/code/session_01ByTXNqDWdM7HzezrFtEvQt

主要語言
Python
星號
4
分支
1
平均合併
10 小時 41 分鐘
30 天內合併 PR
79

環境準備

這個專案沒有提供開發容器、Dockerfile 或貢獻指南,環境需要你自己搭建:先看它的 README,通用步驟見我們的新手貢獻指南。

從這裡開始

  1. 先讀完整個 Issue,再讀專案的貢獻指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言說明你要接手 —— 這能避免兩個人做同樣的事。
  3. Fork 儲存庫,在一個分支上完成修改。
  4. 送出 Pull Request,並在描述裡引用這個 Issue 編號。

cpp-best-practices/project_validator 的其他 Issue

查看 cpp-best-practices/project_validator 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Python Issue

把新 issue 寄到你的電子郵件信箱

精選適合新手參與的 GitHub issue 摘要。