Hacktoberfest 2026:維護者為十月標記出來的 issue,仍然開放、適合新手。 瀏覽 Hacktoberfest issue

Report which extension codec handled each node of a serialized plan

未關閉
#1,706 0 則留言 0 個 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 檢視

還沒有人認領這個 Issue。

評估

難度
5/5
預估耗時
一週以上
新手友好度
35/100
Issue 類型
功能
描述清晰度
基本清楚
活躍度
活躍
技術堆疊
python

研究方向

從 SessionContext.logical_extension_codec_ids() 和 physical_extension_codec_ids() 開始,然後閱讀 #1678 中描述的擴充 codec 鏈。判定序列化 plan 如何為 EXPLAIN 表示,並定義如何將勝出的 codec 歸屬於每個節點;完成的標準是,針對特定 plan 的檢查或 EXPLAIN 結果能夠識別處理每個序列化節點的 codec。

由索引模型根據 Issue 內容生成。

描述

enhancement

Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge? Please describe what you are trying to do.

Extension codecs compose as of #1678: a session holds a chain of them, and encoding walks the chain in install order until one claims an object. With several libraries installed there is currently no way to ask which codec handled a given node. Raised in https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/1678#pullrequestreview-4940081598.

Part of this is answered already. SessionContext.logical_extension_codec_ids() and physical_extension_codec_ids() list what is installed, in install order, and those ids are what a payload carries — so a decode failure names the codec that wrote the bytes and lists what the session actually has. What is missing is per-call attribution: which codec handled which node of a particular plan. Today the only way to find out is to check a codec's own call counters before and after, which requires the codec to expose them and tells you nothing about which node was involved.

Describe the solution you'd like

Surface the winning codec per node, most naturally in EXPLAIN output for a plan that has been serialized, or failing that as an inspection call that reports the encode decisions made for a given plan.

Describe alternatives you've considered

Leaving it to the decode error, which already names the responsible codec. That covers the case where something went wrong but not the case where someone is trying to understand a working setup, which is when a multi-library chain is most confusing.

Logging each claim at debug level. Cheap to add and much weaker: it is per-session rather than per-plan, and it puts the burden of correlating lines with nodes on the reader.

Additional context

Deliberately left out of #1678: recording the winner means threading it through plan formatting, which is a change to how plans are displayed rather than to how codecs compose.

主要語言
Python
星號
605
分支
176
平均合併
1 天 23 小時
30 天內合併 PR
8

貢獻指南

這個儲存庫沒有索引到貢獻指南

從這裡開始

  1. 先讀完整個 Issue,再讀專案的貢獻指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言說明你要接手 —— 這能避免兩個人做同樣的事。
  3. Fork 儲存庫,在一個分支上完成修改。
  4. 送出 Pull Request,並在描述裡引用這個 Issue 編號。

apache/datafusion-python 的其他 Issue

查看 apache/datafusion-python 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Python Issue

把新 issue 寄到你的電子郵件信箱

精選適合新手參與的 GitHub issue 摘要。