Automatic Query Collection refetch still has no observable result-application settlement

未關閉
#1,972 2 則留言 0 個 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 檢視

維護者通常 1 天內回覆

還沒有人認領這個 Issue。

評估

難度
4/5
預估耗時
3-5 天
新手友好度
48/100
Issue 類型
功能
描述清晰度
基本清楚
活躍度
活躍
技術堆疊
sqlite, typescript
領域
database

研究方向

Start in the Query Collection implementation where pendingResultApplications is tracked, then inspect collection.utils and the existing utils.refetch barrier. Use the linked downstream patch and regression test as behavioral references, including automatic invalidation/revalidation and unchanged results. Done means a public observable settlement signal covers every automatic query result without changing the explicit refetch barrier.

由索引模型根據 Issue 內容生成。

描述

Versions

@tanstack/[email protected], @tanstack/[email protected], @tanstack/[email protected], @tanstack/[email protected], @tanstack/[email protected].

Problem

#1828 was closed after utils.refetch() became an awaitable result-application barrier. That fixes an explicit refetch. An automatic Query Collection refetch (Query invalidation/revalidation) still has no public way for a reactive consumer to tell whether its result has finished applying to collection rows.

With an existing persisted row, hold the SQLite commit that applies a newer fetched result. The Query cache already reports a successful, idle fetch with a newer dataUpdatedAt, while collection.get(key) still returns the old row. The pending application is tracked internally by pendingResultApplications, but collection.utils does not expose it. When the result is identical to existing rows, application completion emits no collection change event, so observing collection changes cannot close the gap either.

Our status hook needs this distinction before it treats collection rows as authoritative for a user decision. We currently patch 1.3.1 to expose isApplyingResult and subscribeResultApplications (start, invalidation, and settlement, including empty diffs): downstream patch and regression test.

Expected

Either a public application-phase state with a subscription, or an observable successful-application event/revision that advances for every automatic query result, including an unchanged result. The explicit utils.refetch() barrier can remain as it is; the missing case is work initiated by the Query Collection itself.

主要語言
TypeScript
星號
4k
分支
277
平均合併
1 天 11 小時
30 天內合併 PR
148

環境準備

從這裡開始

  1. 先讀完整個 Issue,再讀專案的貢獻指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言說明你要接手 —— 這能避免兩個人做同樣的事。
  3. Fork 儲存庫,在一個分支上完成修改。
  4. 送出 Pull Request,並在描述裡引用這個 Issue 編號。

TanStack/db 的其他 Issue

查看 TanStack/db 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 TypeScript Issue

把新 issue 寄到你的電子郵件信箱

精選適合新手參與的 GitHub issue 摘要。