[Bug]: procImage is /proc-only on a !windows build, so macOS never resolves an engine image (reclaim declines, one test fails)
維護者通常 5 天內回覆
還沒有人認領這個 Issue。
評估
研究方向
從 proc_unix.go 和 executor_test.go 開始,然後在 darwin 上從 services/nvpair-engine-manager 執行 go test -run TestUninstallTerminatesRunningInstance -count=1 ./...。檢查現有的 procImage 和 image-check 行為,並讓測試準確呈現預期的 macOS 結果;如果選擇變更 image resolution,請檢視現有的 lsof 使用方式和平台限制。完成的標準是:服務測試套件在 macOS 上具有明確且通過的結果,同時不削弱 ownership checks。
由索引模型根據 Issue 內容生成。
描述
Corrected after filing. My first version framed this as an oversight and proposed
ps -o comm=as the fix. Both were wrong and are fixed below:procImage's own doc comment documents the macOS decline as intended, which I quoted around rather than reading, andps -o comm=is spoofable on macOS so it would be the wrong primitive. The executed evidence is unchanged. Apologies for the noise.
On macOS, procImage can never resolve an engine's executable path, so the ownership check in doStop always fails closed. The code intends that decline, and says so. What I would like to put in front of you is the cost of it on a platform where both shipping engines are supported, plus one concrete defect it causes today: make test-services is red on macOS.
Found while testing #9 on Apple Silicon. This is not caused by #9, and it is separate from the loopback-alias failure also visible on macOS. It reproduces at origin/main with the PR absent. Filed separately so #9 stays clean.
PAIR version or commit
13b68115fa2c9c1d94f1ead1358f8d5a527cfecf (origin/main)
Affected component
Engine or model management
Environment
macOS on Apple Silicon (darwin/arm64), Go 1.26.5. Clean tree at the commit above.
Steps to reproduce
git checkout 13b6811
cd services/nvpair-engine-manager
go test -run TestUninstallTerminatesRunningInstance -count=1 ./...
Reproduced on three consecutive runs, and at the head of #9.
Expected behavior
The suite passes on macOS, or the test declares that it asserts Linux-only behavior and skips.
Actual behavior
--- FAIL: TestUninstallTerminatesRunningInstance (1.40s)
executor_test.go:706: uninstall: cannot uninstall engine "fake": cannot stop engine "fake":
it is running under external management (pid 98257, ); stop it in its own application, then retry
Note the empty image field after the pid.
Mechanism, and what is intended
proc_unix.go is built //go:build !windows, so it serves macOS and Linux together, and procImage is implemented for Linux only. Its doc comment states the consequence as a deliberate choice:
macOS has no /proc, so it returns "" there and the image check is skipped — reclamation on macOS relies on the caller declining when the image can't be confirmed.
So the decline is intended. isOurEngineImage rejects an empty image explicitly, and TestIsOurEngineImage asserts that with a {"", false} case, so the fail-closed posture is deliberate at both layers. I should have read that comment before filing; my first version presented this as an accident.
Two things I would still raise:
1. The test fails rather than skips. If declining is correct on macOS, TestUninstallTerminatesRunningInstance is asserting Linux behavior on every platform. Today that leaves make test-services red on a supported development platform, which makes a genuine regression harder to see. A t.Skip on darwin, or an assertion that the decline happens there, would restore a clean baseline.
2. The cost may be higher than the comment implies. manifests/lmstudio.json and manifests/ollama.json both list darwin/arm64 and darwin/amd64, so macOS is a first-class engine platform. On it, the path whose comment reads "so a user OFF actually takes effect instead of being refused forever" cannot run, so a PAIR-managed orphan on PAIR's own port stays refused for the life of the process. I have not reproduced that in the desktop app, so the user-facing impact is inferred from the code path rather than observed.
On resolving the image without weakening the check
If lifting the decline on macOS is of interest, the primitive matters, and the obvious candidate is the wrong one. ps -o comm= on macOS reports an argv[0]-derived name, which a process can set freely:
Probe on darwin/arm64: ps is spoofable, lsof is not
$ ls /proc
ls: /proc: No such file or directory
# procImage copied verbatim from proc_unix.go, run on darwin:
os.Readlink(/proc/21344/exe) err = readlink /proc/21344/exe: no such file or directory
procImage(21344) = ""
# a process that lies about its name
$ (exec -a TOTALLY_FAKE sleep 8 &)
$ ps -o comm= -p 24461
TOTALLY_FAKE
$ lsof -p 24461 -a -d txt -Fn
p24461
ftxt
n/bin/sleep
lsof -p <pid> -a -d txt -Fn returns the executable the kernel actually mapped, not a name the process chose. It also adds no new dependency, since pidOnPort already shells out to lsof in this same file and already bounds it with portLookupTimeout. proc_pidpath() via libproc would be the more direct answer, but it needs cgo, and I could not find any import "C" in the tree, so I assume that is a deliberate posture.
Would a darwin procImage backed by lsof -d txt, plus a platform guard on the test, be a direction you would take? Happy to follow up with a pull request. If you would rather keep the decline on macOS as-is, the test guard alone is still worth having.
Sanitized logs or screenshots
Included above; no credentials, node identities, or network details are involved.
Confirmations
- I searched existing issues for duplicates.
- This is not a security vulnerability.
- I agree to follow the Code of Conduct.
- 主要語言
- Go
- 星號
- 1.6k
- 分支
- 266
- 平均合併
- 3 天 6 小時
- 30 天內合併 PR
- 22
環境準備
- 沒有 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 檔案
- 有 Pull Request 範本
- 閱讀貢獻指南
從這裡開始
- 先讀完整個 Issue,再讀專案的貢獻指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言說明你要接手 —— 這能避免兩個人做同樣的事。
- Fork 儲存庫,在一個分支上完成修改。
- 送出 Pull Request,並在描述裡引用這個 Issue 編號。
NVIDIA/Personal-AI-Router 的其他 Issue
-
難度 5/5 一週以上 新手友好度 20/100
NVIDIA/Personal-AI-Router#165 ·
維護者通常 5 天內回覆
-
bug
難度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 46/100
NVIDIA/Personal-AI-Router#164 ·
維護者通常 5 天內回覆
-
enhancement
難度 4/5 一週以上 新手友好度 12/100
NVIDIA/Personal-AI-Router#162 ·
維護者通常 5 天內回覆
-
enhancement
難度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 25/100
NVIDIA/Personal-AI-Router#154 · 1 則留言 ·
維護者通常 5 天內回覆
-
[Feature]: [Ollama] Alert the user about model pull failures可能已有人在做 @ckelseynv 於 4 天前認領。 未關閉enhancement
難度 3/5 1-2 天 新手友好度 56/100
NVIDIA/Personal-AI-Router#152 · 1 則留言 · 已指派 1 人 ·
維護者通常 5 天內回覆
查看 NVIDIA/Personal-AI-Router 的全部 Issue
相似的 Issue
-
TOTP enrollment returns 500 for phone-only users (empty TOTP account name)可能已有人在做 @emiliosandoval4 今天認領。 未關閉
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 60/100
維護者通常 1 天內回覆
-
8.9 to 8.10 Helm upgrade guide still says deprecated keys are removed in chart v16 (Camunda 8.11)未關閉
難度 1/5 1 小時以內 新手友好度 78/100
camunda/camunda-platform-helm#7559 ·
維護者通常 1 天內回覆
-
docs: namespaceRegexes example teaches prefix matching, but regexes are matched as a substring可能已有人在做 關聯的 PR 仍在進行中或已合併。 未關閉triage/pending-triage
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 74/100
external-secrets/external-secrets#7117 ·
維護者通常 2 天內回覆
-
bug
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 72/100
ENTERPILOT/GoModel#1183 · 1 則留言 ·
維護者通常 1 天內回覆
-
createEtcdKV fails on a single transient etcd endpoint sync timeout可能已有人在做 @vldmit 今天認領。 未關閉contribution
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 70/100
維護者通常 1 天內回覆