Hacktoberfest 2026:維護者為十月標記出來的 issue,仍然開放、適合新手。 瀏覽 Hacktoberfest issue

Support a custom E2B-compatible endpoint for Core-managed sandboxes

已關閉
#179 0 則留言 0 個 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 檢視

維護者通常 1 天內回覆

還沒有人認領這個 Issue。

評估

難度
5/5
預估耗時
一週以上
新手友好度
20/100
Issue 類型
功能
描述清晰度
基本清楚
活躍度
活躍
技術堆疊
go, python

研究方向

Start with services/agents-api/internal/api/sandbox_deployment_setup.go and services/agents-api/tools/e2b-provider/{main.py,provider.py,sdk.py}; inspect the pinned e2b==2.51.0 routing and emitted create request. Then review the listed SandBase controller, lifecycle and template catalog paths and prove the full Core-managed lifecycle with integration tests. Done means secure explicit endpoint configuration, preserved default behavior and passing local end-to-end acceptance, including recovery and data-plane operations.

由索引模型根據 Issue 內容生成。

描述

Goal

Allow an operator to select an explicitly configured E2B-compatible service for Core-managed sandboxes. The existing official E2B cloud configuration remains the default. This is deployment configuration under /core/v1, not an application field under /v1 or a self-hosted executor setting.

Current boundary

At Core 3a82ccc7, the E2B deployment input contains only a write-only api_key and template. The pinned helper uses e2b==2.51.0, constructs ConnectionConfig without an endpoint/domain, and removes E2B_* from its environment. Therefore an operator cannot select a compatible service by changing current configuration or environment variables.

Core call surface to qualify

Core operation E2B SDK/wire dependency SandBase Sandbox at 1b314c363c
Select deployment GET /templates/{templateID} with exact ready build UUID, CPU/memory Route and managed-template response exist; exact SDK parse and build semantics need integration proof
Allocate/reconcile POST /v2/sandboxes, GET /v2/sandboxes with metadata/state pagination, GET /sandboxes/{id} Routes exist; Core sends an explicit lifecycle setting, while the gateway create allowlist omits lifecycle; the exact SDK wire and behavior must be resolved before calling this compatible
Renew/cleanup POST /sandboxes/{id}/timeout, DELETE /sandboxes/{id} Routes exist; Core lifecycle semantics unverified
Observe GET /sandboxes/metrics plus running-sandbox list Route exists; Core batch response parsing and missing-data behavior unverified
Bootstrap/inspect SDK envd commands and files on 49983-{id}.{domain}; command output/stream, stdin, file read/write Data-plane proxy exists and has local SDK/mock coverage; public full-chain TLS and Core bootstrap unverified

Core uses Sandbox.create(template="templateID:buildUUID"), get_info, list, set_timeout, kill, commands and files. Its create call passes lifecycle={on_timeout: kill, auto_resume: false}; the gateway's Create rejects fields outside an allowlist that currently omits lifecycle. Check the pinned SDK's emitted body, then provide equivalent accepted semantics or report a concrete incompatibility. This is the minimum Core path; gateway support for pause/resume, webhooks or ports alone does not qualify Core.

Requirements

  1. Add an explicit operator-owned HTTPS control endpoint and data-plane domain to the E2B deployment configuration. Define the exact SDK 2.51.0 routing mapping and reject unsafe/malformed values. Keep the default official cloud behavior when these fields are omitted. Do not use ambient E2B_* routing overrides.
  2. Propagate the selected endpoint/domain consistently through template validation, create/list/get/renew/kill, observations, SDK envd commands/files and receipt-based recovery. Persist a stable provider endpoint identity with the selection and allocations so a later configuration change cannot reinterpret old sandbox IDs against another service.
  3. Keep the API key write-only/encrypted and Core-host only. Never expose it to Core Web's browser, /v1 responses, Runtime logs or error bodies. Keep the three API credential namespaces separate. Validate HTTPS, trusted host/domain relationship, redirects and data-plane targets before sending credentials or connecting.
  4. Expose and document this option only through the existing /core/v1/sandbox/deployment administrator contract, Core client and operator setup flows. Specify whether endpoint changes require maintenance, current generation and cleanup of old allocations; preserve existing guarded provider-switch and uncertain-write behavior.
  5. Qualify SandBase Sandbox with a local E2B 2.51.0 end-to-end Core integration: exact ready build lookup, selection, allocation, daemon bootstrap, command/file I/O, observation, timeout renewal, cleanup and interrupted-create reconciliation. Verify the expected templateID:buildUUID mapping, metadata/state pagination, error envelopes and TLS hostname behavior. A live public-service acceptance is separate and must report its exact deployment/revision and credential/network path; do not infer it from routes or mocks.
  6. Update the relevant /core/v1 schema, generated contracts, API index, configuration/installer/operator docs and tests. Run make openapi after handler annotation changes and make check before completion.

Evidence and current limitation

  • Core source: services/agents-api/internal/api/sandbox_deployment_setup.go, services/agents-api/tools/e2b-provider/{main.py,provider.py,sdk.py}, requirements.in.
  • Gateway source: sandbase-sandbox/internal/controller/router.go, sandbase-sandbox/internal/service/sandbox/{lifecycle.go,template_catalog.go}, and the data-plane controller.
  • Gateway's 2026-09-28 closeout records public control-plane checks but says full public SDK, template and Codex acceptance remain open; it also records an incomplete wildcard certificate chain. Do not mark SandBase compatible until those gates and the Core-specific path pass.

Acceptance of this issue is Core's configurable, secure endpoint plus demonstrated Core-managed lifecycle on a compatible service. It does not require changing the pinned public Agents API or making SandBase-specific behavior the default.

主要語言
Go
星號
236
分支
31
平均合併
1 小時 18 分鐘
30 天內合併 PR
672

環境準備

  • 沒有 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 檔案
  • 沒有 Pull Request 範本
  • 閱讀貢獻指南

從這裡開始

  1. 先讀完整個 Issue,再讀專案的貢獻指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言說明你要接手 —— 這能避免兩個人做同樣的事。
  3. Fork 儲存庫,在一個分支上完成修改。
  4. 送出 Pull Request,並在描述裡引用這個 Issue 編號。

MiniMax-AI/OpenAgentCore 的其他 Issue

查看 MiniMax-AI/OpenAgentCore 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Go Issue

把新 issue 寄到你的電子郵件信箱

精選適合新手參與的 GitHub issue 摘要。