Hacktoberfest 2026：維護者為十月標記出來的 issue，仍然開放、適合新手。 瀏覽 Hacktoberfest issue

New content type - Scenario

未關閉
  • 哪裡不對？
#811 4 則留言 0 個 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 檢視

還沒有人認領這個 Issue。

評估

難度
5/5
預估耗時
一週以上
新手友好度
20/100
Issue 類型
功能
描述清晰度
需要釐清
活躍度
停滯
領域
content, documentation

研究方向

先查看 PR #765 和 #780 中連結的模式比較，然後檢查參考資料 pattern-categorization/innersource-program-mind-map.png。這項工作目前尚未限定在某個檔案或實作路徑；要完成這項工作，需要就情境內容類型、其有用範圍以及應發布的位置達成共識。

由索引模型根據 Issue 內容生成。

描述

In two recent conversations in PRs, we were unsure which content should go into which of our existing patterns. We ended up creating comparisons between the related patterns, partly supported by AI. These proved to be super helpful to figure out what the core focus of each of the existing patterns is, and how new patterns can add new insights to "fill the gaps" between the existing patterns.

Besides being useful for pattern maintainers in the context of a PR, I wonder if such overviews/comparisons could also be useful for regular readers of our patterns, to figure out how the patterns are related to each other.

Such a write-up does not feel like a pattern but rather like a new content type of our InnerSource patterns book. If I had to give such write-ups a name I might call it "scenario", "use case", or even just "article".

Example Scenarios

We could publish a scenario called "Enable project reuse". In that scenario we would incorporate this comparison table, and point to patterns immediately related to the scenario.

Recent conversations with pattern comparisons

  • comparison of patterns related to the Governance Levels pattern - see comment / #765
  • comparison of patterns related to the Discover your InnerSource - see comment / #780

Related

Two other things that this idea reminds me of:

  • @rrrutledge had pitched the idea of an InnerSource handbook some time ago. The handbook also wanted to use a format that was less strict than our pattern format, while still reusing or referencing a lot of the content that our patterns provide.
  • Our mindmap is already grouping the patterns into smaller groups. For each of these groups one might publish a scenario article. e.g. the "Discovery Challenges" group already contains some of the patterns that might be used in the "Enable project reuse" example above.

Out of scope (for now)

The new content type that we are exploring here could be integrated into one or multiple of our existing ISC assets. e.g. this could fit into the InnerSource Patterns book but also in the Learning Path, or even the Managing InnerSource Projects book.

I think that it would be best to first discuss which content would be helpful for the readers, and how hard it would be to generate such content (we have very few contributors, so I don't want to create an idea that cannot be implemented anyways because it requires too much effort).

Once that is clear, we could discuss again where that content should be published. It could even be integrated into multiple ISC assets.

主要語言
HTML
星號
853
分支
206
平均合併
1 天 23 小時
30 天內合併 PR
2

環境準備

  • 沒有 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 檔案
  • 沒有 Pull Request 範本
  • 閱讀貢獻指南

從這裡開始

  1. 先讀完整個 Issue，再讀專案的貢獻指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言說明你要接手 —— 這能避免兩個人做同樣的事。
  3. Fork 儲存庫，在一個分支上完成修改。
  4. 送出 Pull Request，並在描述裡引用這個 Issue 編號。

InnerSourceCommons/InnerSourcePatterns 的其他 Issue

查看 InnerSourceCommons/InnerSourcePatterns 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Content Issue

把新 issue 寄到你的電子郵件信箱

精選適合新手參與的 GitHub issue 摘要。