Cross-provider subagent delegation fails (Codex → GOAT MiniMax)
維護者通常 1 天內回覆
還沒有人認領這個 Issue。
評估
- 難度
- 4/5
- 預估耗時
- 3-5 天
- 新手友好度
- 18/100
- Issue 類型
- 缺陷
- 描述清晰度
- 基本清楚
- 活躍度
- 活躍
- 技術堆疊
- nodejs
- 領域
- ai, authentication
研究方向
The payload names createHarnessSession and runSubAgent, plus provider resolution and auth routing, as the places where the Director's provider is reused for the child. Start by reading those functions to see how a subagent's pinned model is matched to a provider, and reproduce with a custom subagent pinned to a model from another provider. Done means the child returns SUBAGENT_OK across providers, the original provider error surfaces on failure, and regression tests cover both same-provider and cross-provider delegation.
由索引模型根據 Issue 內容生成。
描述
Summary
Problem
I'm trying to use two different model providers within Command Code:
- Director: GPT-6.1 Sol using my existing ChatGPT/Codex subscription.
- Subagent: MiniMax M3 using my existing Command Code GOAT subscription.
Both models work independently, but the Director cannot delegate tasks to the MiniMax subagent.
I'd like to request an official fix for cross-provider subagent delegation.
Environment
- Command Code CLI: 1.88.2
- Node.js: v24.21.0
- Operating system: Ubuntu VPS
- OpenAI provider:
@byokkit/cmd-provider-openai0.1.5 - Subagent model:
MiniMaxAI/MiniMax-M3
Steps to reproduce
- Connect ChatGPT/Codex and Command Code GOAT.
- Create a custom subagent with MiniMax M3 as its pinned model.
- Select GPT-6.1 Sol from the ChatGPT/Codex section as the main model.
- Ask Sol to delegate the task: "Reply exactly SUBAGENT_OK."
- The subagent immediately fails.
- Switch the main model to MiniMax M3 through Command Code and repeat. Delegation succeeds.
Actual result
The subagent fails before generating output or using tools.
The underlying error is:
HTTP 400 — Provider not available. Use Command Code provider.
Trace ID: 70c44b34dc2c73ba64de17906f21efaf
Command Code only displays: sub-agent stopped early: the run errored.
Investigation findings
Codex inspected the installed Command Code implementation.
It found that the subagent correctly selects MiniMax M3 but appears to reuse the Director's provider authentication and model transport.
This would explain why MiniMax → MiniMax works, while Sol/Codex → MiniMax/GOAT fails.
The custom-agent configuration also has no documented way to override the provider separately for the child.
These findings have not yet been confirmed by the Command Code maintainers.
Requested fix
Could you please investigate and fix this in an official Command Code release?
Ideally, each subagent should:
- Use the provider and authentication associated with its own selected model.
- Support delegation between ChatGPT/Codex and Command Code GOAT subscriptions.
- Return clear error messages when execution fails.
- Continue supporting existing single-provider configurations.
If this feature is intentionally unsupported, please consider adding it.
I would also appreciate confirmation of whether an official workaround already exists or a fix is planned.
Thank you!
Expected Behavior
The GPT-6.1 Sol Director, authenticated through my existing ChatGPT/Codex subscription, should be able to delegate tasks to a MiniMax M3 subagent using my Command Code GOAT subscription.
Each agent should use its own model provider and authentication. The MiniMax subagent should execute the task and return its result to the Director without requiring manual provider switching or an additional subscription.
Actual Behavior
Both models work independently, but cross-provider delegation fails before the subagent executes its first turn.
The underlying error is:
HTTP 400 — Provider not available. Use Command Code provider.
Command Code only displays:
sub-agent stopped early: the run errored
The child produces zero tokens and performs zero tool calls.
Investigation of the installed CLI indicates that the subagent selects the correct MiniMax model but inherits the Director's OpenAI/Codex provider authentication and transport.
MiniMax-to-MiniMax delegation works correctly.
Trace ID: 70c44b34dc2c73ba64de17906f21efaf
Steps to reproduce the issue
- Connect an existing ChatGPT/Codex subscription and a Command Code GOAT account using
/connect. - Create a custom subagent named
sub-agentwithmodel: MiniMaxAI/MiniMax-M3andreasoningEffort: medium. - Select GPT-6.1 Sol from the ChatGPT/Codex section as the main model.
- Ask the Director: "Delegate to sub-agent. Do not use tools. Reply exactly SUBAGENT_OK."
- Observe that the subagent fails immediately with a generic run error.
- Switch the main model to MiniMax M3 through Command Code GOAT.
- Repeat the same delegation. The subagent succeeds and returns SUBAGENT_OK.
Command Code Version
1.88.2
Operating System
Linux
Terminal/IDE
Remote SSH terminal (Ubuntu VPS)
Shell
bash
Session file (optional)
No response
Fix prompt (optional)
Fix cross-provider subagent delegation in Command Code.
The Director uses GPT-6.1 Sol through the OpenAI/Codex subscription, while the subagent uses MiniMax M3 through Command Code GOAT.
The current implementation appears to reuse the Director's provider authentication and model transport when launching a subagent, even when the child has a different pinned model.
Please investigate createHarnessSession, runSubAgent, provider resolution, and authentication routing.
Expected fix:
- Resolve each subagent's provider and authentication independently.
- Preserve the Director's existing provider and subscription.
- Support direct Codex → GOAT delegation without a custom bridge.
- Surface the original provider error when a subagent fails.
- Preserve compatibility with existing single-provider delegation.
Add regression tests for both same-provider and cross-provider delegation.
Please implement this in an official release if technically supported, or clarify the intended limitation.
Additional context
No response
- 主要語言
- 沒有語言資料
- 星號
- 4.2k
- 分支
- 377
- 平均合併
- 1 天 3 小時
- 30 天內合併 PR
- 6
環境準備
這個專案沒有提供開發容器、Dockerfile 或貢獻指南,環境需要你自己搭建:先看它的 README,通用步驟見我們的新手貢獻指南。
從這裡開始
- 先讀完整個 Issue,再讀專案的貢獻指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言說明你要接手 —— 這能避免兩個人做同樣的事。
- Fork 儲存庫,在一個分支上完成修改。
- 送出 Pull Request,並在描述裡引用這個 Issue 編號。
CommandCodeAI/command-code 的其他 Issue
-
Provider /v1/messages rejects role:"system" inside messages[] — Claude Code ≥ 2.1.154 incompatible未關閉
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 75/100
CommandCodeAI/command-code#1085 ·
維護者通常 1 天內回覆
-
Feature request: auto-reconnect remote control (/rc) after restart可能已有人在做 @aliarain 於 20 天前認領。 未關閉p2
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 85/100
CommandCodeAI/command-code#992 · 1 則留言 · 已指派 1 人 ·
維護者通常 1 天內回覆
-
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 68/100
CommandCodeAI/command-code#933 ·
維護者通常 1 天內回覆
-
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 68/100
CommandCodeAI/command-code#855 ·
維護者通常 1 天內回覆
-
grep tool passes empty file type to ripgrep可能已有人在做 @ahmadbilaldev 於 19 天前認領。 未關閉
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 68/100
CommandCodeAI/command-code#655 · 1 則留言 ·
維護者通常 1 天內回覆
查看 CommandCodeAI/command-code 的全部 Issue
相似的 Issue
-
enhancement
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 65/100
developmentwithyash/yaan#60 ·
維護者通常 1 天內回覆
-
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 68/100
維護者通常 1 天內回覆
-
area/billing area/config comp/tui-gateway P2 provider/openrouter type/bug
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 68/100
NousResearch/hermes-agent#153086 · 1 則留言 ·
維護者通常 1 天內回覆
-
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 74/100
維護者通常 2 天內回覆
-
ai-generated structs tech-debt
難度 2/5 1-3 小時 新手友好度 76/100
維護者通常 1 天內回覆