[Feature Request] a foreign constraint attribute for scalar fields not implying a relation mapping
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Newbie friendliness
- 15/100
- Issue type
- Feature
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Tech stack
- typescript
- Domain
- database
Research direction
Language-design request for the ZModel schema DSL: a new @foreign attribute must be threaded from attribute declaration through schema validation to generated migration DDL. No file or test is named, so start where built-in attributes like @relation are declared, parsed and validated, then follow migration generation. Open semantic question: SQL foreign keys require a unique referenced column, so references: [kind] needs a design decision; done means the schema compiles and the migration emits the constraint.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Problem
model ModelA {
id Int,
name String
bKind String //should matches a value that exists in ModelB.kind
}
model ModelB {
id Int,
name String
kind String //this is not unique and can't identify a single ModelB row
}
Unfortunately, AFAIK the only current way of describing a FK is through a @relation attribute that enforce matching an unique and effective object, that should be present in the linked model.
That's not ideal when one just want to ensure scalars consistency from the described zmodel.
Proposal
A new @foreign attribute allowing to describe a simple FK constraint would be nice
i.e:
model TableA {
id Int,
name String
bKind String @foreign(fields:[bKind], references:[kind], from: ModelB)
}
Describe alternatives you've considered
Adding custom SQL to create the FK in a migration. But, IMHO, the ORM model should allow describing simple FK and abstract their creation.
- Dominant language
- TypeScript
- Stars
- 2.9k
- Forks
- 157
- Avg merge
- 11h 42m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 20
Getting set up
This project ships no dev container, Dockerfile or contributing guide, so setting up is up to you: start from its README, and see our first-contribution guide for the general steps.
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from zenstackhq/zenstack
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
zenstackhq/zenstack#2873 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
runtime
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
zenstackhq/zenstack#2868 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
zenstackhq/zenstack#2694 · 3 comments ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 68/100
zenstackhq/zenstack#2659 · 2 comments ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 65/100
zenstackhq/zenstack#2542 · 1 comment ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
All issues in zenstackhq/zenstack
Similar issues
-
chore v2
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
modelcontextprotocol/servers#5115 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
beginner bug good first issue
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 85/100
philaconvalley/website#168 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
bug frontend good first issue
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 86/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 82/100
oss-slu/lrda_mobile#294 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
hatchet-dev/hatchet#5179 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day