Add method to ModelContext for application driven observation
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Newbie friendliness
- 38/100
- Issue type
- Feature
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Tech stack
- html
- Domain
- api
Research direction
Start by reading the observation and ModelContext sections of the WebMCP specification. The issue proposes an application-driven observation method but does not identify a section, file, or test to change. Work out how the method fits the existing observation model and define what behavior and tests would demonstrate completion.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Currently the spec only mentions
The times at which a browser agent performs an observation are implementation-defined
But to me it seems that in practice it would be the app itself that is best positioned to perform an observation, since only the app dev knows what part of the app state would most relevant to a browser agent, and therefore it can send observations when that state changes and avoid filling up the context of an agent with irrelevant stuff.
- Dominant language
- Bikeshed
- Stars
- 4.7k
- Forks
- 328
- Avg merge
- 2d 15h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 16
Getting set up
This project ships no dev container, Dockerfile or contributing guide, so setting up is up to you: start from its README, and see our first-contribution guide for the general steps.
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from webmachinelearning/webmcp
-
Difficulty 1/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
webmachinelearning/webmcp#360 · 1 comment ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Say how an agent should weigh annotations that the page wrote about itselfPossibly taken A pull request linked to this issue is open or already merged. Open
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
webmachinelearning/webmcp#353 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 67/100
webmachinelearning/webmcp#343 · 1 reaction ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Agenda+ i18n-tracker
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
webmachinelearning/webmcp#273 · 3 comments ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
a11y-tracker Agenda+
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 67/100
webmachinelearning/webmcp#272 · 4 comments · 2 reactions ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
All issues in webmachinelearning/webmcp
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 82/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 85/100
Eyevinn/open-videocore#1256 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
[Bug][API] Switching workflow versions leaves schedules onlinePossibly taken @zhuangchong claimed this today. Open
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 82/100
apache/dolphinscheduler#18731 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day