Hacktoberfest 2026: the issues maintainers tagged for October, open and beginner-friendly. Browse Hacktoberfest issues

vp lint / vp run lint print no summary on a clean pass (unlike vp exec turbo run lint)

Open
#2,035 2 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Assessment

Difficulty
3/5
Estimated time
1-2 days
Newbie friendliness
68/100
Issue type
Bug
Clarity
Clearly specified
Activity status
Active
Domain
tooling

Research direction

Reproduce the direct vp lint . and vp exec turbo run lint --filter=some-pkg --force commands from the issue and compare their clean-pass output. Trace the vp lint/vp run lint path and its handling of the underlying oxlint result; done means a clean direct run prints the warning/error, timing, file, and rule summary while preserving the reported exit status.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Description

Summary

Running vp lint <path> (or vp run lint, the task-runner form) directly prints nothing at all and exits 0 when there are zero lint violations — no "Found 0 warnings and 0 errors" summary, no file/rule count, nothing. The same underlying lint task, when invoked via vp exec turbo run lint --filter=<pkg>, prints the full oxlint summary line even on a clean pass:

manolea-placeholder:lint: $ vp lint .
manolea-placeholder:lint: Found 0 warnings and 0 errors.
manolea-placeholder:lint: Finished in 422ms on 1103 files with 95 rules using 16 threads.

To be clear, this is not a correctness bug — I verified with injected violations that both invocation paths correctly detect and report real problems (a syntax error fails with exit 1 and the parse error text; a debugger; statement prints the eslint(no-debugger) warning by name in both paths). The only difference is the empty-output case.

Why this is worth fixing

Empty stdout + exit 0 is ambiguous to a human running vp lint . locally before pushing: "no output" could mean "ran cleanly" or "didn't actually run" (e.g. wrong cwd, misconfigured filter, crashed silently). The turbo-wrapped invocation resolves that ambiguity by always printing a summary; the direct vp lint/vp run lint invocation doesn't.

Repro

In a workspace with a shared vite.config.ts (via defineConfig(), exporting lint/run/etc. sub-configs) and a package whose package.json has "lint": "vp lint .":

# From the package directory — prints nothing, exit 0
cd packages/some-pkg
vp lint .
echo $?   # 0

# From the workspace root — prints a summary even though nothing changed
vp exec turbo run lint --filter=some-pkg --force

Ask

Have vp lint/vp run lint print the same "Found N warnings and M errors. Finished in Xms on Y files with Z rules" summary on a clean pass that vp exec turbo run lint shows, so a passing run is visibly distinguishable from a run that silently did nothing.

Environment

  • vite-plus 0.2.1
  • oxlint 1.70.0
  • Linux x86_64
Dominant language
Rust
Stars
5.8k
Forks
263
Avg merge
1d 4h
Merged PRs (30d)
148

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

More from voidzero-dev/vite-plus

All issues in voidzero-dev/vite-plus

Similar issues

More Rust issues

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.