S3 for files instead of local storage.
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100
Research direction
The issue does not name files, tests, or an entry point. First locate how Gitly currently stores files locally, then determine the configuration and storage behavior needed for S3; done means users can choose S3 instead of local storage and the result supports horizontal scaling and small servers.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
We should add an ability to use s3 for file storage rather than local storage if the user wants. This will allow both horizontal scaling as well as hosting on small servers like fly.io.
Since already RAM requirements are very less.
- Dominant language
- V
- Stars
- 1.5k
- Forks
- 79
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from vlang/gitly
-
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 25/100
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 15/100
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 25/100
-
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 35/100
Similar issues
-
Area: Excel support
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
orbeon/orbeon-forms#7893 ·
-
essnmx good first issue
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 95/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
yeti-platform/yeti#1380 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
modelcontextprotocol/python-sdk#3566 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 70/100
griptape-ai/griptape#2353 ·