Hacktoberfest 2026: những issue maintainer đã đánh dấu cho tháng Mười, đang mở và phù hợp người mới. Xem issue Hacktoberfest

PDE update checks silently fail because `/download/latest.txt` returns `1.5.1` instead of a build number

Đang mở
#719 0 bình luận 0 reaction 1 người được giao Xem trên GitHub

@catilac đang làm issue này rồi.

Từ ngày 22/9/2026.

Đánh giá

Issue này chưa được đánh giá.

Mô tả

Tl;dr: Looks like Processing users may not have been getting update notifications in the PDE since October last year.

Normally, Processing shows a popup when a newer version is available.

The way the PDE knows a new version is available is by reading https://processing.org/download/latest.txt and comparing the revision number with its own.

Right now the number is both wrong (1.5.1 when the latest stable version is 4.5.6) and the wrong format (the PDE expects a revision number like 1434 and NOT semantic versioning like 4.5.6).

You can also come discuss this on this Discord thread for quicker back and forth and unformed thoughts. However, please post any relevant insights in the comments below so the findings are not siloed to Discord.

[!WARNING]
AI Disclosure: The report below was generated with AI help. Specifically, Claude Opus 5 for the initial report, with verification by Codex Astra GPT 6 High

I have verified that the report is directionally sound but human replication/investigation is necessary. I added some notes in the body of the issue for additional context or where I disagreed with the machine.

Summary

https://processing.org/download/latest.txt currently returns:

1.5.1

It should return the integer build number of the latest stable release, currently 1434 for Processing 4.5.6.

Impact

The PDE update checker reads this endpoint:

readInt calls Integer.parseInt(reader.readLine().trim()). The response 1.5.1 throws NumberFormatException, stopping the check before it compares the latest build with the installed revision.

The background thread catches and ignores the exception. Clients using this endpoint therefore receive no PDE update prompt while it serves this value.

Processing 3 uses the same path over HTTP; its current behavior also depends on HTTP serving and redirects.

[!NOTE]
Raph: This could have been a contributing factor to the decline in downloads we have observed beginning in October 2025 (speculative).

Image

Regression

The source regression was introduced by “Automate selection of latest Processing releases” (bd09d71a, October 15, 2025), then merged on October 16 (4bc0ef7b). The exact production onset requires deployment records.

That change replaced the manually ordered selection with a generated list. Its first entry changed from processing-1310-4.4.10 to processing-1.5.1, without changing the build hook that assumes the first entry is the latest release.

Executing the existing build hook with historical selection data confirms:

Selection data Generated latest.txt
Before the regression commit 1310
At the regression commit 1.5.1
Current checkout 1.5.1

Cause

onPostBuild in gatsby-node.js writes:

const latest = releases.selectedReleases[0];
const [name, number, version] = latest.split('-');
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(__dirname, 'public', 'download', 'latest.txt'), number);

Two assumptions fail:

  1. fetchReleases.js groups releases under numeric major-version keys and uses Object.values(), which enumerates those keys in ascending order.
  2. The tag processing-1.5.1 has no build-number segment, so splitting it writes the version string as the build number.

The current selection is:

"selectedReleases": [
  "processing-1.5.1",
  "processing-0225-2.1.2",
  "processing-0270-3.5.4",
  "processing-1434-4.5.6"
]

Even selecting an older tag with a valid numeric build would incorrectly suppress update prompts for newer installed versions.

Suggested fix

[!NOTE]
Raph: The suggested fix below continues to use selected.json as the source of truth. I don't think that's the right call. We could get the revision number directly from the release tag on GitHub.

Select the highest build number independently of array order, skip tags without a build-number segment, and fail the build if no valid candidate exists:

exports.onPostBuild = () => {
  const { selectedReleases } = require('./content/download/selected.json');
  const build = selectedReleases
    .map((tag) => tag.match(/^processing-(\d+)-/))
    .filter(Boolean)
    .map((match) => Number(match[1]))
    .sort((a, b) => b - a)[0];

  if (!build) {
    throw new Error(
      'latest.txt: no release with a build number in selected.json'
    );
  }

  fs.writeFileSync(
    path.join(__dirname, 'public', 'download', 'latest.txt'),
    String(build)
  );
};

This produces 1434 for the current selection, including with the array reversed, and throws when no build-number tags exist.

Two additional validation gaps remain:

The hook runs during builds, not local development. After deploying the fix, eligible clients on older builds should resume receiving update prompts.

Ngôn ngữ chính
MDX
Star
90
Fork
122
Merge trung bình
1 giờ 43 phút
Pull request đã merge (30 ngày)
3

Hướng dẫn đóng góp

Chưa lập chỉ mục được hướng dẫn đóng góp cho kho mã nguồn này

Bắt đầu từ đâu

  1. Đọc hết issue, rồi đọc hướng dẫn đóng góp của dự án.
  2. Bình luận trên issue rằng bạn sẽ nhận — tránh hai người làm cùng một việc.
  3. Fork repository và làm thay đổi trên một nhánh.
  4. Mở pull request có tham chiếu số hiệu của issue.

Issue khác của processing/processing-website

Tất cả issue của processing/processing-website

Nhận issue mới trong hộp thư của bạn

Bản tóm tắt ngắn những issue GitHub phù hợp với người mới.