Hacktoberfest 2026: những issue maintainer đã đánh dấu cho tháng Mười, đang mở và phù hợp người mới. Xem issue Hacktoberfest

.dockerignore wildcard exceptions lose files inside excluded directories

Đang mở
  • Có gì không ổn?
#3,448 1 bình luận 0 reaction 0 người được giao Xem trên GitHub

Chưa có ai nhận issue này.

Đánh giá

Độ khó
3/5
Thời gian dự kiến
1-2 ngày
Mức phù hợp với người mới
80/100
Loại issue
Lỗi
Độ rõ ràng
Đặc tả rõ ràng
Mức độ hoạt động
Sôi nổi
Công nghệ
docker, python
Lĩnh vực
build-system

Hướng nghiên cứu

Start from docker.utils.tar (docker/utils/build.py) and follow how exclude patterns are converted into match rules for the context tarball; the bug is in how ** plus a ! exception is evaluated for nested paths. Run the issue's reproduce-wildcard.py script first to confirm it prints an empty SDK context file list, then look for the existing exclusion-pattern unit tests (tests/unit/utils_test.py) as the place to add a regression case. Done means all three a.txt files appear in the tar with ['**', '!**/a.txt'] while other exclusion cases keep behaving as before.

Do mô hình lập chỉ mục viết ra từ nội dung của issue.

Mô tả

🤖 this issue description was generated by an LLM. i reviewed it before submitting. 🤖

I used Codex for the investigation, reproduction scripts, and this draft.

When I generate a build context with docker.utils.tar, the rules ** and !**/a.txt omit every nested a.txt. Docker's BuildKit keeps those files with the same input. The SDK therefore drops files that the exception explicitly includes.

Reproduction

Save this script as reproduce-wildcard.py:

import tarfile
from pathlib import Path
from tempfile import TemporaryDirectory

import docker
from docker.utils import tar

patterns = ['**', '!**/a.txt']
files = ['foo/a.txt', 'foo/bar/a.txt', 'target/a.txt']
with TemporaryDirectory() as directory:
    root = Path(directory)
    (root / 'Dockerfile').write_text('FROM scratch\nCOPY . /\n')
    (root / '.dockerignore').write_text('\n'.join(patterns) + '\n')
    for relative in files:
        path = root / relative
        path.parent.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
        path.write_text(relative)
    with tar(str(root), exclude=patterns.copy()) as context:
        with tarfile.open(fileobj=context) as archive:
            actual = sorted(name for name in archive.getnames() if name in files)
    print('docker:', docker.__version__)
    print('patterns:', patterns)
    print('SDK context files:', actual)

I ran it in an isolated uv environment, using commit 56343ddf8f0c44281e151c2dad016c16cdb8393d:

uv run --isolated --no-project --no-config --no-cache \
  --python /home/jyn/.local/share/mise/installs/python/3.14.7/bin/python3 \
  --with 'docker @ git+https://github.com/docker/docker-py@56343ddf8f0c44281e151c2dad016c16cdb8393d' \
  python reproduce-wildcard.py

The --python path selects my tested Python installation; use the path to your Python executable on another machine. The pinned requirement selects the upstream SDK rather than an installed copy. I did not modify the SDK or replace its modules with mocks. This reproducer creates disposable files and examines the SDK's context tar without contacting a Docker daemon.

Expected behavior

The SDK should retain foo/a.txt, foo/bar/a.txt, and target/a.txt. I built the same files with FROM scratch and COPY . / using BuildKit, and its local output retained all three.

Actual output

docker: 7.2.1.dev26+g56343ddf8
patterns: ['**', '!**/a.txt']
SDK context files: []

BuildKit control

I ran the following standalone control with Docker's active lima context and lima builder. It creates the same input files, runs docker buildx build with a local filesystem export, and enumerates every exported regular file before removing the temporary directories. The command uses the active Docker context and builder; another machine can use its own working configuration.

Buildx command and exported-file inspection

Save this script as buildkit-control-wildcard.py:

import subprocess
from pathlib import Path
from tempfile import TemporaryDirectory

patterns = ['**', '!**/a.txt']
files = ['foo/a.txt', 'foo/bar/a.txt', 'target/a.txt']
with TemporaryDirectory() as directory:
    context = Path(directory) / 'input'
    context.mkdir()
    output = Path(directory) / 'output'
    (context / 'Dockerfile').write_text('FROM scratch\nCOPY . /\n')
    (context / '.dockerignore').write_text('\n'.join(patterns) + '\n')
    for relative in files:
        path = context / relative
        path.parent.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
        path.write_text(relative)
    subprocess.run([
        'docker', 'buildx', 'build',
        '--progress=plain', '--provenance=false',
        '--output', f'type=local,dest={output}', str(context),
    ], check=True)
    print('BuildKit output files:', sorted(
        path.relative_to(output).as_posix()
        for path in output.rglob('*') if path.is_file()
    ))

Run it with:

python3 buildkit-control-wildcard.py

I got this stdout; Buildx wrote its progress log to stderr and exited successfully:

BuildKit output files: ['foo/a.txt', 'foo/bar/a.txt', 'target/a.txt']

Related report

A commenter described a similar wildcard-exception failure in the closed issue #1514. I can reproduce the minimized case below using the current upstream commit.

https://github.com/docker/docker-py/issues/1514#issuecomment-298018267

Environment

  • Docker SDK for Python: 7.2.1.dev26+g56343ddf8, using upstream commit 56343ddf8f0c44281e151c2dad016c16cdb8393d.
  • Python: 3.14.7 (main, Sep 29 2026, 15:01:40) [Clang 22.1.3 ].
  • OS/distribution: CachyOS Linux, rolling release (BUILD_ID=rolling; /etc/os-release does not define VERSION_ID).
  • Kernel/platform: Linux-7.2.9-1-cachyos-x86_64-with-glibc2.44.
  • Docker CLI: 29.8.2; Docker Engine: 29.8.0 (linux/amd64).
  • Buildx: github.com/docker/buildx 0.37.2 2d379c0c3f22da0d2759d132a0ec81ca949098f0.
  • The SDK tar reproducer requires no engine connection; the separate BuildKit comparison used the versions above.
Ngôn ngữ chính
Python
Star
7.2k
Fork
1.7k
Không có pull request nào được merge trong 30 ngày

Chuẩn bị môi trường

Bắt đầu từ đâu

  1. Đọc hết issue, rồi đọc hướng dẫn đóng góp của dự án.
  2. Bình luận trên issue rằng bạn sẽ nhận — tránh hai người làm cùng một việc.
  3. Fork repository và làm thay đổi trên một nhánh.
  4. Mở pull request có tham chiếu số hiệu của issue.

Issue khác của docker/docker-py

Tất cả issue của docker/docker-py

Issue tương tự

Thêm issue về Python

Nhận issue mới trong hộp thư của bạn

Bản tóm tắt ngắn những issue GitHub phù hợp với người mới.