Hacktoberfest 2026: những issue maintainer đã đánh dấu cho tháng Mười, đang mở và phù hợp người mới. Xem issue Hacktoberfest

[coverage] Conformance findings: TELEMETRY-001,TELEMETRY-002,TELEMETRY-003,TELEMETRY-005

Đang mở
#927 0 bình luận 0 reaction 0 người được giao Xem trên GitHub

Chưa có ai nhận issue này.

Đánh giá

Độ khó
4/5
Thời gian dự kiến
3-5 ngày
Mức phù hợp với người mới
45/100
Loại issue
Lỗi
Độ rõ ràng
Khá rõ ràng
Mức độ hoạt động
Sôi nổi
Công nghệ
python, sql
Lĩnh vực
backend, observability

Hướng nghiên cứu

Bắt đầu với tên của các test bị lỗi trong coverage PR và kiểm tra các đường dẫn telemetry cho Thrift và kernel/SEA, bao gồm kernel/_errors.wrap_kernel_exception. So sánh hành vi dự kiến với reference PR cho shared conformance spec. Hoàn tất khi các test TELEMETRY-001, -002, -003 và -005 đều pass với telemetry terminal và telemetry lỗi đầy đủ, đã được làm sạch.

Do mô hình lập chỉ mục viết ra từ nội dung của issue.

Mô tả

Summary

Surfaced by the multi-language coverage fan-out while conformance-testing these SPEC-IDs against databricks/databricks-sql-python. Each finding is committed as an expected-failure (xfail) test in the coverage PR — the test asserts the CORRECT (post-fix) behavior and stays red until THIS driver (databricks/databricks-sql-python) is fixed, then flips green as a tripwire.

Findings

  • TELEMETRY-001 [thrift]: terminal statement event never populates sql_operation.operation_detail (no operation_type, no is_internal_call), so the sync-execute path is indistinguishable from the async submit path and internal-driver statements cannot be excluded from aggregates
    • failing test: test_successful_statement_execution_emits_terminal_operation_event (see the coverage PR diff under tests/)
  • TELEMETRY-001 [sea]: on the kernel/SEA backend the terminal event reports execution_result=FORMAT_UNSPECIFIED for an inline result and is_compressed from the connection's requested LZ4 setting rather than the result's declared codec, plus operation_detail is never populated (no operation_type / is_internal_call)
    • failing test: test_successful_statement_execution_emits_terminal_operation_event (see the coverage PR diff under tests/)
  • TELEMETRY-002 [thrift]: failure telemetry is exported (and correctly leaks no SQL text) but the error descriptor carries no sql_statement_id — export_failure_log reports only session_id — so it cannot be joined to the statement that failed
    • failing test: test_failed_statement_emits_sanitized_error_telemetry_without_sql_text (see the coverage PR diff under tests/)
  • TELEMETRY-002 [sea]: on the kernel/SEA backend NO error telemetry is exported for a failed statement: kernel/_errors.wrap_kernel_exception constructs PEP-249 exceptions without the host_url that exc.Error.init needs in order to reach export_failure_log, so every kernel-path failure is invisible to telemetry
    • failing test: test_failed_statement_emits_sanitized_error_telemetry_without_sql_text (see the coverage PR diff under tests/)
  • TELEMETRY-003 [thrift]: the async statement's terminal event reports no n_operation_status_calls and no operation_status_latency_millis, and is not tagged as the async issue path (operation_detail is never populated); the single-emission guarantee itself holds
    • failing test: test_async_statement_emits_one_terminal_event_with_status_poll_counters (see the coverage PR diff under tests/)
  • TELEMETRY-003 [sea]: on the kernel/SEA backend the async statement's terminal event likewise reports no n_operation_status_calls / operation_status_latency_millis and no async operation_type, so status-poll work is unmeasurable; single emission holds
    • failing test: test_async_statement_emits_one_terminal_event_with_status_poll_counters (see the coverage PR diff under tests/)
  • TELEMETRY-005 [sea]: on the kernel/SEA backend a CloudFetch/external-links result reports execution_result=FORMAT_UNSPECIFIED instead of EXTERNAL_LINKS (KernelResultSet exposes no results queue for latency_logger to classify) and is_compressed reflects the requested LZ4 setting rather than the codec the result declared
    • failing test: test_telemetry_reports_external_links_delivery_and_compression (see the coverage PR diff under tests/)
  • TELEMETRY-001: terminal statement telemetry never populates sql_operation.operation_detail (no operation_type, no is_internal_call), so the sync-execute and async-submit paths are indistinguishable and driver-internal statements cannot be excluded from aggregates; on the kernel/SEA backend execution_result is additionally always FORMAT_UNSPECIFIED and is_compressed reports the connection's requested LZ4 setting instead of the result's declared codec
  • TELEMETRY-002: on the kernel/SEA backend NO error telemetry is exported for a failed statement (kernel/_errors.wrap_kernel_exception builds exceptions without the host_url that exc.Error.init needs to reach export_failure_log), so failures are invisible to telemetry; on Thrift the descriptor is exported but carries no sql_statement_id, so it cannot be joined to the statement it describes
  • TELEMETRY-003: an async-submitted statement's terminal event reports no status-poll bookkeeping — n_operation_status_calls and operation_status_latency_millis are never populated — and is not tagged as the async issue path, so poll work performed on the application's behalf is unmeasurable (single-emission itself is correct)
  • TELEMETRY-005: on the kernel/SEA backend a CloudFetch/external-links result reports execution_result=FORMAT_UNSPECIFIED instead of EXTERNAL_LINKS (KernelResultSet exposes no results queue for latency_logger to classify) and is_compressed reflects the requested LZ4 setting rather than the codec the result declared, so result-delivery telemetry does not describe how the result actually arrived

Context

Ngôn ngữ chính
Python
Star
233
Fork
152
Merge trung bình
21 giờ 5 phút
Pull request đã merge (30 ngày)
10

Hướng dẫn đóng góp

Mở hướng dẫn đóng góp

Bắt đầu từ đâu

  1. Đọc hết issue, rồi đọc hướng dẫn đóng góp của dự án.
  2. Bình luận trên issue rằng bạn sẽ nhận — tránh hai người làm cùng một việc.
  3. Fork repository và làm thay đổi trên một nhánh.
  4. Mở pull request có tham chiếu số hiệu của issue.

Issue khác của databricks/databricks-sql-python

Tất cả issue của databricks/databricks-sql-python

Issue tương tự

Thêm issue về Python

Nhận issue mới trong hộp thư của bạn

Bản tóm tắt ngắn những issue GitHub phù hợp với người mới.