array memset testing

Bắt đầu tại crates/rustc_codegen_spirv/src/builder/builder_methods.rs và xem xét các helper memset cùng các đường điền mảng. Điều chỉnh các ca kiểm thử từ PR #586 để bao phủ việc điền mảng bằng memset cho u64, i64 và u32, sau đó kiểm tra disassembly được tạo ra. Công việc được xem là hoàn tất khi các kiểm thử phát hiện được các đột biến được mô tả trong issue mà không có khoảng trống compiletest hoặc difftest.

UPDATED: I tried a few mutations in PR which do not trigger any CI failures on my personal fork: https://github.com/brody2consult/rust-gpu/pull/2

diff --git a/crates/rustc_codegen_spirv/src/builder/builder_methods.rs b/crates/rustc_codegen_spirv/src/builder/builder_methods.rs
index d86db1cbd0..c2143f4436 100644
--- a/crates/rustc_codegen_spirv/src/builder/builder_methods.rs
+++ b/crates/rustc_codegen_spirv/src/builder/builder_methods.rs
@@ -290,22 +290,15 @@ macro_rules! simple_uni_op {
 }
 
 fn memset_fill_u16(b: u8) -> u16 {
-    b as u16 | ((b as u16) << 8)
+    0xbad_u16 | ((b as u16) << 10)
 }
 
 fn memset_fill_u32(b: u8) -> u32 {
-    b as u32 | ((b as u32) << 8) | ((b as u32) << 16) | ((b as u32) << 24)
+    0xbad_u32 | ((b as u32) << 20)
 }
 
 fn memset_fill_u64(b: u8) -> u64 {
-    b as u64
-        | ((b as u64) << 8)
-        | ((b as u64) << 16)
-        | ((b as u64) << 24)
-        | ((b as u64) << 32)
-        | ((b as u64) << 40)
-        | ((b as u64) << 48)
-        | ((b as u64) << 56)
+    0xbad_u64 | ((b as u64) << 30)
 }
 
 fn memset_dynamic_scalar(
@@ -384,9 +377,6 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Builder<'a, 'tcx> {
                 32 => self
                     .constant_u32(self.span(), memset_fill_u32(fill_byte))
                     .def(self),
-                64 => self
-                    .constant_u64(self.span(), memset_fill_u64(fill_byte))
-                    .def(self),
                 _ => self.fatal(format!(
                     "memset on integer width {width} not implemented yet"
                 )),
@@ -2911,7 +2901,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> BuilderMethods<'a, 'tcx> for Builder<'a, 'tcx> {
         };
         let elem_ty_spv = self.lookup_type(elem_ty);
         let pat = match self.builder.lookup_const_scalar(fill_byte) {
-            Some(fill_byte) => self.memset_const_pattern(&elem_ty_spv, fill_byte as u8),
+            Some(_) => self.memset_const_pattern(&elem_ty_spv, 123),
             None => self.memset_dynamic_pattern(&elem_ty_spv, fill_byte.def(self)),
         }
         .with_type(elem_ty);

and some more that do not trigger any compiletest failures or difftest failures in my personal workarea:

diff --git a/crates/rustc_codegen_spirv/src/builder/builder_methods.rs b/crates/rustc_codegen_spirv/src/builder/builder_methods.rs
index d86db1cbd0..b6a867933f 100644
--- a/crates/rustc_codegen_spirv/src/builder/builder_methods.rs
+++ b/crates/rustc_codegen_spirv/src/builder/builder_methods.rs
@@ -290,21 +290,16 @@ macro_rules! simple_uni_op {
 }
 
 fn memset_fill_u16(b: u8) -> u16 {
-    b as u16 | ((b as u16) << 8)
+    b as u16
 }
 
 fn memset_fill_u32(b: u8) -> u32 {
-    b as u32 | ((b as u32) << 8) | ((b as u32) << 16) | ((b as u32) << 24)
+    b as u32
 }
 
 fn memset_fill_u64(b: u8) -> u64 {
     b as u64
         | ((b as u64) << 8)
-        | ((b as u64) << 16)
-        | ((b as u64) << 24)
-        | ((b as u64) << 32)
-        | ((b as u64) << 40)
-        | ((b as u64) << 48)
         | ((b as u64) << 56)
 }

I discovered this while investigating possible testing for a more general solution to #594.

I suspect the test cases from PR #586 may be able to help avoid this issue if we can adapt these to test memset array fill for u64, i64, u32, etc & check the disassembly. This could give me some more confidence in case we would ever want to refactor some of this memset-related code (someday).