Hacktoberfest 2026: the issues maintainers tagged for October, open and beginner-friendly. Browse Hacktoberfest issues

BridgeJS: Remove JSException storage boxing once swiftlang/swift#89715 lands

Open
#767 0 comments 0 reactions 1 assignee View on GitHub

@krodak is already working on this.

Since Jun 11, 2026.

Assessment

This issue has not been assessed yet.

Description

Tracks removal of the JSException storage boxing introduced in #766.

Context

swiftlang/swift#89320 miscompiles Wasm calls to captureless async throws(JSException) closure values when the typed error exceeds the direct error convention: the thrown error is corrupted across the async unwind, so the rejected Promise receives garbage. JSException (~36 bytes) always took the affected indirect-error path.

#766 works around this at the library level by boxing JSException's stored properties (thrownValue, description, stack) into a private final class, shrinking the struct to a single stored reference so it travels in the direct error convention and the broken path is never taken. The public API is unchanged; the cost is one heap allocation per thrown exception. The original exploration is in https://github.com/PassiveLogic/JavaScriptKit/pull/13.

The codegen-level counterpart for zero-parameter async throwing exports is tracked separately in #761.

What to do once the compiler fix ships

The proper fix is swiftlang/swift#89715 (IRGen: fix async typed throws miscompiles on Wasm). Once it is available in the oldest Swift toolchain JavaScriptKit supports:

  • Move thrownValue, description, and stack back to stored properties on JSException and delete the Storage class. This is a library-internal layout change only, not a breaking API change.
  • Keep the async closure reject end-to-end tests as the regression guard that the reject path still works without the boxing.
Dominant language
Swift
Stars
986
Forks
76
Avg merge
21h 11m
Merged PRs (30d)
4

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

More from swiftwasm/JavaScriptKit

All issues in swiftwasm/JavaScriptKit

Similar issues

More Swift issues

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.