Define the portable application deployment adapter contract
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100
- Issue type
- Feature
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Activity status
- Active
- Tech stack
- typescript, vite
- Domain
- backend-api-design, build-system, devops, documentation
Research direction
Start by tracing the plugin-managed application mode, generated virtual modules, environment setup, build ordering, output directories, manifests, and prerender behavior described in the issue. Map the existing provider-facing assumptions, then document and test a stable contract; done means deployment adapters can use named APIs or types without importing private modules or reproducing internal behavior.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Problem
The plugin-managed application mode can compose with provider Vite plugins, but the deployment-facing contract is currently spread across generated virtual modules, environment setup, build ordering, output directories, manifests, static output, and prerender behavior.
Provider integrations should not need to depend on undocumented implementation details to deploy a Solid application.
Proposed scope
Document and test the portable contract between @solidjs/vite-plugin and deployment adapters:
- the production server service entry and Fetch handler shape
- client and server environment names and required build ordering
- client assets, manifests, and output locations
- SSR, client-only, and server-function-only output differences
- static shell and prerender output
- which lifecycle steps the Solid plugin owns
- which responsibilities remain with provider plugins
Where appropriate, expose named APIs or types instead of requiring adapters to import private virtual modules or reproduce internal assumptions.
Non-goals
- implementing provider-specific deployment policy
- replacing Cloudflare, Netlify, Nitro, or other Vite integrations
- prescribing platform configuration
The goal is a stable composition boundary so provider plugins can remain thin adapters over a web-standard Solid application handler.
- Dominant language
- TypeScript
- Stars
- 520
- Forks
- 70
- Avg merge
- 23h 35m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 39
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from solidjs/solid-vite-plugin
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
solidjs/solid-vite-plugin#205 · 1 comment · 2 reactions ·
-
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 68/100
solidjs/solid-vite-plugin#369 ·
-
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 68/100
solidjs/solid-vite-plugin#308 ·
-
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 72/100
solidjs/solid-vite-plugin#262 · 2 comments ·
-
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 65/100
solidjs/solid-vite-plugin#259 · 2 comments · 1 reaction ·
All issues in solidjs/solid-vite-plugin
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 84/100
copse-dev/agent-pane#2953 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 84/100
Eynzof/Hermes-CN-Desktop#610 ·
-
bug clawsweeper:linked-pr-open clawsweeper:needs-live-repro clawsweeper:no-new-fix-pr impact:message-loss issue-rating: 🐚 platinum hermit P2 regression
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
-
enhancement
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
-
calcite-components needs triage refactor
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
Esri/calcite-design-system#15203 ·