Make link headers canonical
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Activity status
- Stale
- Domain
- documentation
Research direction
Read the linked Link headers section in the Solid OIDC specification and review the stated treatment of RDF in the WebID Profile as canonical. Determine whether Link headers should instead be canonical and document the decision or resulting specification change.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
In the current specification, the section on Link headers says that "a client MUST treat the RDF in the body of the WebID Profile as canonical."
Is there a specific reason for this decision?
I am asking because having the Link header as canonical instead would allow for an easier integration of this (non-writable) technical information with the (preferably writable) content of a Solid Profile.
- Dominant language
- Bikeshed
- Stars
- 26
- Forks
- 14
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from solid/solid-oidc
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 62/100
solid/solid-oidc#258 ·
-
doc: solid-oidc-primer editorial
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 75/100
solid/solid-oidc#144 ·
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 20/100
solid/solid-oidc#238 · 1 comment ·
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 15/100
solid/solid-oidc#237 · 1 comment · 1 reaction ·
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 35/100
solid/solid-oidc#231 · 1 comment ·
All issues in solid/solid-oidc
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
agilepathway/label-checker#640 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
BasedHardware/omi#15662 · 1 comment ·
-
documentation help wanted
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 90/100
-
documentation good first issue
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
amponce/archive-movie-browser#167 ·
-
user-reported
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 85/100
Kong/developer.konghq.com#7316 ·