Are relative links in Solid-OIDC Client Identifier Document supported?
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Activity status
- Stale
- Domain
- authentication, documentation
Research direction
Start by reading the Solid-OIDC Client ID Document section and compare its URI requirements with the linked OpenID Dynamic Client Registration Client Metadata specification. Decide whether the specification should require absolute URIs or require relative-URI support, then update the relevant Solid-OIDC requirement and any affected conformance guidance.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
We recently ran into an situation where a client added some metadata to its Client ID Document, in particular a logo_uri. The value for this property was relative URL, which isn't something that is explicitly prevented by the specification, and can make sense in the context of a dereferencable Client ID.
The Client Metadata semantics in Solid-OIDC are aligned with the underlying OpenID Dynamic Client Registration specification, but in the context of that specification, relative URLs don't make sense, so this isn't called out.
In order to remain aligned with the underlying Client Metadata specification, the Solid-OIDC specification could add another requirement on the Client in its Client ID Document section, such as "URIs provided as values for parameters in the Client ID Document MUST be absolute".
The alternative would be to add a requirement on the OP conformance class to support relative URIs, but I think it moves away from the underlying specification and would potentially open up possibilities for more misalignments.
- Dominant language
- Bikeshed
- Stars
- 26
- Forks
- 14
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from solid/solid-oidc
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 62/100
solid/solid-oidc#258 ·
-
doc: solid-oidc-primer editorial
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 75/100
solid/solid-oidc#144 ·
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 20/100
solid/solid-oidc#238 · 1 comment ·
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 15/100
solid/solid-oidc#237 · 1 comment · 1 reaction ·
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 30/100
solid/solid-oidc#227 · 1 comment ·
All issues in solid/solid-oidc
Similar issues
-
documentation help wanted
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 76/100
AXERA-TECH/ax-llm#75 ·
-
bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
gitbutlerapp/gitbutler#15998 · 1 comment ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
sympozium-ai/sympozium#627 ·
-
clawsweeper:needs-product-decision clawsweeper:no-new-fix-pr clawsweeper:source-repro impact:security impact:ux-friction issue-rating: 🦞 diamond lobster P2
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 84/100