Interoperability via convergence, not standardisation
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100
- Issue type
- Feature
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Domain
- documentation
Research direction
No file, test, or entry point is identified in the issue. Start by reading the repository context and the discussion around convergence versus standardisation. Before implementation, clarify the intended change and define what an emergent standards resource should contain and how completion will be evaluated.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Shapes repo not acting as a strict standard, but more like emergent standards resource defined through usage and discussion.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 7
- Forks
- 3
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from solid/shapes
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 35/100
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 25/100
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 25/100
-
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 45/100
-
Generate TS in CI Open
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 48/100
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 82/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
-
enhancement
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 74/100