evaluate LinkML, including docs and tooling
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100
- Issue type
- Feature
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- documentation, tooling
Research direction
Start by reading the linked LinkML documentation, especially the collaborative development, SHACL generator, JSON-LD, implements/instantiates, and URI-mapping guides. Then inspect the repository context for its current SHACL integration; done would require a documented evaluation, a decision about adoption or integration, and scoped follow-up work.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
It could provide better path of integration with various existing technologies. As well as developer experience could be better compared to working with raw SHACL
Some docs worth highlighting
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 7
- Forks
- 3
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from solid/shapes
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 35/100
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 25/100
-
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 45/100
-
Generate TS in CI Open
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 48/100
-
Versioning of shapes Open
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 35/100
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 82/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
-
enhancement
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 74/100