[Movement] Diagnose the e1m5 stationary route window without a pause marker
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 22/100
Research direction
Start by running python tools/argus_gait.py runs/broad_mhb_e1m5_2.log and reading docs/mover-intelligence.md and runs/mover-intelligence.results.json to rebuild the steering, goal, door and lift context around the six-second window at about t=33.1 near -555.1 1569.9 16.9. Done means classifying that window as a controller wait or a physical wedge with explicit attribution, and, if it is a wedge, adding a physical regression test before any recovery change. The study tools and tapes exist only in the local working tree, so confirm they are available before starting.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
This follow-up comes from the 2026-10-31 broader-map study and documentation audit. Session baseline: 777ae0bbc8c439aa9888c6a0c978f428464752cf. New study tools, fixtures and tapes are currently in the local development working tree; the paths below describe that tree, not files already published at the baseline commit. No gameplay binary was installed.
Observed window
The rejected mover prototype's second 60-second e1m5 holdout has a six-second Romero stationary window beginning about t=33.1 at -555.1 1569.9 16.9, mode 2, with zero health lost. The native brief reports one freeze. The gait reader finds no chosen-hesitation marker for that window:
python tools/argus_gait.py runs/broad_mhb_e1m5_2.log
Its output labels this the pre-existing wedge class, meaning no attributable hesitation marker; that label does not prove the defect predates the candidate. The tape is not an under-fire freeze, and a single window does not establish that the mover prototype caused it. No board event occurs on that tape, though two lift selections do.
Evidence: docs/mover-intelligence.md, runs/mover-intelligence.results.json and the unchanged raw holdout tape. Closed #274 concerned an obsolete 38-node graph; this tape uses the current 155-node graph, so regenerating the old issue's graph is not an established fix.
Acceptance
- Reconstruct steering/goal/door/platform context around the exact window using native brief/timeline and the shared tape reader; distinguish a controller wait from a physical wedge.
- Reproduce with an unchanged control and candidate, preserving source/binary/tape identities and actual cadence.
- If this is a necessary mover/door hold, attribute it explicitly rather than changing safety thresholds to hide it. If it is a wedge, add a meaningful physical regression before changing recovery.
- Validate any movement change on other maps and retain aim/fire, task/mover ownership and destination safety.
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 4
- Forks
- 0
- Avg merge
- 30m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 130
Getting set up
- No Dockerfile or Docker Compose file
- Has a pull request template
- Read the contributing guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from saworbit/argus
-
bug lab rust-mcp
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
enhancement lab research
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 25/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
enhancement lab rust-mcp
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 30/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
bug lab rust-mcp
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 42/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
tooling
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 55/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
Similar issues
-
ライブラリを追加Openpriority middle
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 62/100
KATO-Hiro/AtCoderClans#13015 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
needs-review
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 70/100
UCS-Care-Group/mailcraft#1429 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
priority: medium ready
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 88/100
TusanHomichi/PSIV#646 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 70/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
area:tui bug P1
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 62/100
agent-of-empires/agent-of-empires#5705 · 1 comment ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day