🎯 v1.0.0 — Definition of Done
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Newbie friendliness
- 8/100
Research direction
This is a v1.0.0 tracking issue, not a single task, so pick one bounded piece such as a named package or the benchmark targets (under 50ms P99 ingestion, under 200MB memory, 10,000+ events/second) and confirm with maintainers first. The payload names the packages @rustrak/server, @rustrak/client, webview-ui and @rustrak/mcp but no file paths, so start by reading the repository layout. Done is the exit question in the issue: a release a production team could adopt without caveats.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Why not v1 yet?
Rustrak is functional, used in the wild, and solves real problems today. But shipping a v1 means committing to stability, and there are three areas that aren't there yet:
A) Chaotic versioning. Each package (@rustrak/server, @rustrak/client, webview-ui, @rustrak/mcp) follows its own independent versioning. A user can't easily tell if [email protected] is compatible with [email protected] or [email protected]. From v1 onwards, the entire monorepo moves in lockstep: a single version number, a single changelog, guaranteed compatibility across all packages.
B) Insufficient testing for a 1.0 product. The backend already has a solid foundation of unit and integration tests, but we need to go further for a production-grade release. The frontend has zero automated tests. To call this v1, we need to ship with confidence.
C) Frontend is still green. The UI works but has been built feature by feature without a unified vision. Component structure, navigation patterns, and UX consistency need a deep refactor before presenting it as a finished product. This is not a visual redesign — it's establishing a solid frontend architecture to iterate on in v1.x without breaking everything.
What needs to happen for v1
1. Lockstep versioning
- Unify versioning across all packages in the monorepo
- Single consolidated changelog per release
- Automated release tooling
2. Testing & benchmarks
Server:
- Expand coverage to all critical paths
- Regression tests for core ingestion and digest flows
- Reproducible benchmark suite certifying project performance goals:
- <50ms P99 ingestion latency
- <200MB memory under load
- 10,000+ events/second throughput
Frontend:
- Integration tests from scratch covering all primary flows:
- Authentication (login, register, session)
- Issue browsing, search, and filtering
- Issue detail and event drill-down
- Project and settings management
End-to-end:
- Full pipeline tests: SDK → ingestion → digest → UI
- Validating that errors sent from any Sentry-compatible SDK appear correctly in the dashboard
Client package:
- Tests against the real API (not just mocks) covering all public endpoints
3. Frontend refactor
- Consistent component architecture (patterns, directory structure, composition)
- Unified design system (typography, colors, spacing, consistent loading/error/empty states)
- Well-defined navigation and page hierarchy
- Every view handles loading, error, and empty states gracefully
- Solid responsive behavior across devices
4. Solid error tracking core
- Sentry SDK error ingestion: stable, battle-tested, no known edge cases
- Issue grouping: mature algorithm, no false groupings
- Search, filtering, and issue navigation: smooth and reliable
- Project, environment, and release management: functional and clear
- All features built along the way working correctly end-to-end
What does NOT block v1
- Experimental or partial features can ship — clearly marked as beta
- Incremental improvements and polish items can remain open
- Feature-specific documentation can continue growing post-v1
Exit criteria
The question to answer is not "are all issues closed?" but rather:
"Would you recommend Rustrak to a production team without having to add 'but watch out for...'?"
When the answer is yes with no caveats, it's v1.
- Dominant language
- TypeScript
- Stars
- 170
- Forks
- 25
- Avg merge
- 17h 40m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 49
Getting set up
- Ships a Dockerfile or Docker Compose file
- No pull request template
- Read the contributing guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from rustrak/rustrak
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
rustrak/rustrak#389 · 1 comment · 1 reaction ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 77/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 22/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 38/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 76/100
radix-ui/primitives#4228 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 66/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 70/100
SignalK/freeboard-sk#1093 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 76/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
[测试] 等待仓库加载后再记录多仓库排序基线Possibly taken @myot233 claimed this today. Open
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 84/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day