epoll_event cannot carry provenance on user data
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 45/100
- Issue type
- Feature
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Domain
- operating-systems
Research direction
Start at the existing Rust libc declaration of epoll_event and compare it with the C definitions quoted in the issue. Determine whether libc 1.0 should expose the union directly or whether libc 0.2 needs separate event_data and event_ctl APIs; done means the chosen provenance-preserving interface is implemented and checked against pointer-carrying use cases.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
The epoll_event type is declared like this in C:
struct epoll_event {
uint32_t events; /* Epoll events */
epoll_data_t data; /* User data variable */
};
union epoll_data {
void *ptr;
int fd;
uint32_t u32;
uint64_t u64;
};
typedef union epoll_data epoll_data_t;
However, the Rust version in libc is different -- it just uses u64 for the data field. That is, unfortunately, not equivalent -- u64 cannot carry pointer provenance, so programs that want to store a pointer in data (which is quite common) need to use exposed-provenance APIs (i.e., ptr/int casts). Tokio carries some funky hacks to avoid that.
Since the C API is actually compatible with strict provenance here, it would be nice to expose that in libc as well. Given this is a breaking change it can only happen for libc 1.0 -- though it would be possible to have a separate event_data type and event_ctl declaration in its own module even in libc 0.2.
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 2.6k
- Forks
- 1.3k
- Avg merge
- 2d 13h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 27
Getting set up
- No Dockerfile or Docker Compose file
- Has a pull request template
- Read the contributing guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from rust-lang/libc
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 90/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
riscv32gc-unknown-linux-gnu: `timex` uses the 32-bit `c_long` layout (144 bytes), glibc's riscv32 `struct timex` is 208 bytesPossibly taken @compiler-segfault claimed this 4 days ago. OpenC-bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 76/100
rust-lang/libc#5697 · 3 comments ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Expose `open_how` on AndroidPossibly taken A pull request linked to this issue is open or already merged. Open
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
rust-lang/libc#5673 · 1 comment ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
RTEMS: `dirfd` is not declaredPossibly taken A pull request linked to this issue is open or already merged. Open
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
rust-lang/libc#5655 · 1 comment ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
C-bug O-macos
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
rust-lang/libc#5650 · 16 comments ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
Similar issues
-
bug priority: medium
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
storytold/photocraft#12706 · 1 comment ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 85/100
IngvarConsulting/unica#2822 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100