Is there a possibility to release a version that uses full openCV instead of headless

Open
#365 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Maintainers usually reply within 1 day

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Assessment

Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Newbie friendliness
32/100
Issue type
Feature
Clarity
Needs clarification
Activity status
Stale
Tech stack
opencv, python

Research direction

Review the package dependency and release configuration to understand how the SDK currently selects headless OpenCV. Define a supported release path using full OpenCV without breaking existing SDK functions, then verify the package can be installed and used alongside the requested OpenCV features.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Description

We have had some issues without headless breaking our full openCV packages. We unfortunately need this for other functions so would appreciate a way to run the SDK without it

Dominant language
Python
Stars
642
Forks
146
Avg merge
1d 10h
Merged PRs (30d)
13

Getting set up

Open in Codespaces

Starts the project's dev container in your browser, under your own GitHub account.

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

More from roboflow/roboflow-python

All issues in roboflow/roboflow-python

Similar issues

More Python issues

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.