don't use `Video.jsx`
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 2/5
- Estimated time
- 1-3 hours
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100
- Issue type
- Refactor
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Activity status
- Stale
- Tech stack
- javascript, react
- Domain
- frontend
Research direction
Start by inspecting Video.jsx and index.js to understand how the template uses the local component and how it conflicts with Remotion's Video component. Check the referenced Remotion Video documentation and decide on the maintainers' preferred organization; done means the naming conflict is removed without changing the template's behavior.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Suboptimal to create a <Video> component when there already is another <Video>.
Unsure what to call it, or maybe include all of it inside index.js?
- Dominant language
- JavaScript
- Stars
- 15
- Forks
- 7
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from remotion-dev/template-helloworld-javascript
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 45/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 35/100
remotion-dev/template-helloworld-javascript#6 · 3 comments · 1 reaction ·
All issues in remotion-dev/template-helloworld-javascript
Similar issues
-
bug confirmed issue
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
open-webui/open-webui#30750 · 1 comment ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 70/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
-
Mend: dependency security vulnerability untriaged
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 70/100