`safe[]` and rchk
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 30/100
Research direction
Start by reproducing the rchk warning for a function wrapped with safe that uses safe[], then inspect how arguments are forwarded and whether the && is involved. Done means the cause is established and the warning is resolved or documented without breaking argument forwarding.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
rchk gives a warning of the form
ignoring variable df as it has address taken, results will be incomplete
if used in a function wrapped with safe . I wonder if we really need the && when forwarding arguments, I haven't investigated further.
- Dominant language
- C++
- Stars
- 224
- Forks
- 52
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from r-lib/cpp11
-
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 35/100
-
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 48/100
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 20/100
-
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 42/100
-
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 45/100
Similar issues
-
ai_reviewed
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
ydb-platform/ydb#53869 · 3 comments ·
-
bug cert blocker needs triage
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 82/100
project-chip/connectedhomeip#74373 ·
-
upstream update
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
conan-io/conan-center-index#31035 ·
-
Bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
-
documentation
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 85/100
vllm-project/vllm-ascend#17329 ·