Rename and inline silently skip modules with syntax errors when ignore_syntax_errors is set
Maintainers usually reply within 7 days
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100
- Issue type
- Bug
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Activity status
- Active
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- developer-experience
Research direction
Start with the repro script, which uses Rename from rope.refactor.rename and inline.create_inline from rope.refactor.inline under ignore_syntax_errors=True, and compare with the run that raises ModuleSyntaxError when the flag is off. Trace where the occurrence finder skips unparseable modules and where the ChangeSet is built. Done means a caller can learn which module was skipped, either through a per-call override that raises or through a list of skipped resources, and the maintainers have picked one of those approaches.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
With ignore_syntax_errors=True, cross-module refactorings treat a module that fails to parse as if it contained no occurrences. The module is left out of the ChangeSet and nothing tells the caller, so the refactoring leaves broken code behind.
Editors and language servers have to set this preference, because a project nearly always has a file that is half-edited. So every Rope-based tool can hit this, and the user only finds out when the skipped module fails at import time.
To Reproduce
import pathlib
import tempfile
from rope.base.project import Project
from rope.refactor import inline
from rope.refactor.rename import Rename
root = pathlib.Path(tempfile.mkdtemp())
(root / "a.py").write_text("def helper(x):\n return x * 2\n")
(root / "b.py").write_text("from a import helper\nprint(helper(3))\n")
# c.py uses helper too, but has a syntax error further down
(root / "c.py").write_text("from a import helper\nprint(helper(4))\nif\n")
for name, make in [
("rename", lambda p, r: Rename(p, r, 4).get_changes("double")),
("inline", lambda p, r: inline.create_inline(p, r, 4).get_changes()),
]:
project = Project(str(root), ropefolder=None, ignore_syntax_errors=True)
changes = make(project, project.get_resource("a.py"))
print(name, sorted(c.resource.path for c in changes.changes))
Output on master (46ebf37), Python 3.13:
rename ['a.py', 'b.py']
inline ['a.py', 'b.py']
After the rename, c.py still imports helper, which no longer exists. After the inline, a.py is empty and c.py imports a function that has been deleted. Without ignore_syntax_errors, both refactorings raise ModuleSyntaxError for c.py, which is the safe outcome.
Expected behaviour
The caller should learn that a module which may contain occurrences could not be analysed, so that it can refuse the refactoring or warn the user. Some possible approaches:
- A per-call override, such as
get_changes(..., ignore_syntax_errors=False), that raisesModuleSyntaxErrornaming the module, even when the project preference is set. - A list of the skipped resources, on the ChangeSet or the task handle.
Either would be enough. The occurrence finder already filters modules by a textual match before parsing them, so only modules that mention the name would need to be reported.
Editor information
- Python 3.13
- Rope master 46ebf37 (also 1.14.0)
- Found while adding Rope refactorings to rope-language-server, which has to set
ignore_syntax_errors
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 2.2k
- Forks
- 197
- Avg merge
- 2d 13h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 5
Getting set up
- No Dockerfile or Docker Compose file
- Has a pull request template
- Read the contributing guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from python-rope/rope
-
Difficulty 1/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
python-rope/rope#927 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 7 days
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
python-rope/rope#926 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 7 days
-
simplify.real_code blanks t-strings, so renames inside them edit the wrong offsetPossibly taken @sean0407 claimed this 10 days ago. Open
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 83/100
python-rope/rope#913 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 7 days
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 30/100
python-rope/rope#925 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 7 days
-
Extract method/variable and introduce parameter don't check whether the new name is already in useOpen
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 62/100
python-rope/rope#924 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 7 days
All issues in python-rope/rope
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 78/100
521xueweihan/HelloGitHub#4237 ·
-
bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
jejjohnson/gaussx#721 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
mock-core-configs/etc/mock/rocky-10-riscv64.cfg contains the wrong architecture in config_opts['root']Possibly taken @jasonmontleon claimed this 4 days ago. Open
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 94/100
rpm-software-management/mock#1834 ·
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 75/100
elastic/elastic-otel-python#683 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
ci-rerun: collect.py fails a whole pr-babysit cycle on one transient GitHub 5xx and never retriesOpenfollow-up
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 62/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day