Arbitrary instance for sets

Open
#70 1 comment 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Assessment

Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Newbie friendliness
15/100
Issue type
Feature
Clarity
Needs clarification
Activity status
Stale
Domain
testing

Research direction

The issue asks whether to add an arbitrary instance using purescript-sets, but names no files, tests, or implementation entry points. First read the project’s existing Arbitrary instances and dependency policy; the issue needs a decision on whether the dependency is acceptable before work can start.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Description

status: needs more info

Considering doing this but it would add a dependency on purescript-sets. Should it be done or not?

Dominant language
PureScript
Stars
108
Forks
42
Avg merge
2d 23h
Merged PRs (30d)
1

Getting set up

  • No Dockerfile or Docker Compose file
  • Has a pull request template
  • No contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

More from purescript/purescript-quickcheck

All issues in purescript/purescript-quickcheck

Similar issues

More Testing & QA issues

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.