Add `last :: forall f a. NonEmpty f a -> a` ?
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100
- Issue type
- Feature
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Activity status
- Stale
Research direction
The issue proposes adding last :: forall f a. NonEmpty f a -> a and notes O(N), but names no source file or test. First inspect the repository's NonEmpty definitions and existing traversal or lookup tests; done means the proposed function is added with its linear-time behavior covered by tests.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
O(N)
- Dominant language
- PureScript
- Stars
- 17
- Forks
- 25
- Avg merge
- 3d 10m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 1
Getting set up
- No Dockerfile or Docker Compose file
- Has a pull request template
- No contributing guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from purescript/purescript-nonempty
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 35/100
purescript/purescript-nonempty#54 · 4 comments ·