Drop unverifiable "in minutes" claim from the /product/superintelligence-infrastructure/ closing heading

Open Beginner friendly
#21,570 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Assessment

Difficulty
1/5
Estimated time
Under an hour
Newbie friendliness
92/100
Issue type
Documentation
Clarity
Clearly specified
Activity status
Active
Tech stack
markdown
Domain
documentation

Research direction

Edit content/product/superintelligence-infrastructure.md around line 147, in the learn: block that renders the closing CTA heading. Compare the rendered heading with the page's supporting proof points, remove the unverifiable time claim, and verify the heading now reads "Build superintelligence infrastructure".

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Description

area/www-content Bug
Where

content/product/superintelligence-infrastructure.md line 147, the learn: block that renders as the closing CTA heading (<h2> in <section id="learn">) on https://www.pulumi.com/product/superintelligence-infrastructure/.

What's live today

Build superintelligence infrastructure in minutes

Why this needs a fix

"Superintelligence infrastructure" is an open-ended outcome with no defined scope, so pairing it with a bounded time claim ("in minutes") is not verifiable and reads as marketing hyperbole rather than a claim we could stand behind if asked.

The page's own cited proof points undercut the claim directly. The stats band on the same page (lines 24-25) reports Snowflake's deployment cycles going from 1.5 weeks to under 24 hours, not minutes. The Supabase case study on the same page (line 75) cites a week for regional infrastructure readiness. The page's own overview (line 13) scopes "superintelligence infrastructure" as spanning "pre-training on 100,000+ GPUs to serving billions of inference requests" - work that takes far longer than minutes by any customer evidence the page itself presents.

That mismatch between a closing headline and the body's own supporting data is exactly the kind of inconsistency an AI answer engine or a skeptical reader picks up on, and it undercuts the credibility of the surrounding, better-supported claims.

Proposed fix

Drop the time claim and let the heading stand on the outcome alone:

Build superintelligence infrastructure

An alternative would be to move the time-bound claim down to the first item under the heading ("Get started with Pulumi Cloud in minutes"), since that's the actual bounded action being described. We'd lean against that option here because the item directly below the heading is already titled "Get started with Pulumi Cloud", so repeating it in the heading would make the H2 and the H5 beneath it nearly identical.

Opening a PR against this issue now.

Dominant language
HTML
Stars
178
Forks
271
Avg merge
1d 1h
Merged PRs (30d)
546

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

More from pulumi/docs

All issues in pulumi/docs

Similar issues

More Documentation issues

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.