Add Spring Boot auto-configuration for standalone ActivityClient
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 2 dias
@Quinn-With-Two-Ns já está trabalhando nisso.
Desde 23/10/2026.
- #3157 de @Quinn-With-Two-Ns — aberto
Avaliação
- Dificuldade
- 4/5
- Tempo estimado
- 3-5 dias
- Facilidade para iniciantes
- 35/100
- Tipo de issue
- Funcionalidade
- Clareza
- Razoavelmente clara
- Status de atividade
- Ativa
- Stack de tecnologia
- java, spring-boot
- Domínio
- backend
Direção de pesquisa
The issue names no files. Start from the existing WorkflowClient and ScheduleClient auto-configuration in the Spring Boot integration and copy its bean naming, @Primary handling, and backoff conditions for ActivityClient. Done means a root ActivityClient injects without a qualifier, non-root clients resolve by alias, and tests cover customizers and application-provided clients.
Escrita pelo modelo de indexação a partir do texto da issue.
Descrição
What would you like added?
The Java SDK provides ActivityClient for starting and managing standalone activity executions, but the Temporal Spring Boot integration does not currently auto-configure it.
Please add ActivityClient support alongside the existing WorkflowClient and ScheduleClient support, including root and non-root namespaces.
Why is this needed?
Currently, applications must declare their own ActivityClient beans and manually apply namespace, data converter, and interceptor configuration.
Auto-configuration would make standalone activities easier to use from controllers and other Spring-managed components, while keeping client configuration consistent with the rest of the Temporal integration.
Proposed behavior
1. Register a client for each configured namespace.
Follow the existing client bean naming conventions:
- Root namespace:
temporalActivityClient, marked@Primary. - Non-root namespace:
<namespace-alias>ActivityClient, falling back to the namespace name when no alias is configured.
For example:
spring:
temporal:
namespace: apps
namespaces:
- namespace: partner
alias: partner
Applications could then inject the root client:
public AppsController(ActivityClient activityClient) {
this.activityClient = activityClient;
}
Or select a non-root client:
public PartnerController(
@Qualifier("partnerActivityClient") ActivityClient activityClient) {
this.activityClient = activityClient;
}
2. Apply namespace-specific configuration.
Each client should use the appropriate:
WorkflowServiceStubsand connection configuration.- Namespace.
- Data converter.
- Activity client interceptors.
Provide an options customization hook consistent with the existing integration:
@Bean
public TemporalOptionsCustomizer<ActivityClientOptions.Builder>
activityClientCustomizer() {
return builder -> builder.setIdentity("my-application");
}
Support namespace-specific customizers using the existing non-root customization conventions.
3. Keep operation options at the invocation level.
StartActivityOptions, including task queue and timeouts, should remain arguments to activity invocations rather than become part of the auto-configured client.
4. Support application-provided clients.
Follow the integration’s bean override/backoff conventions so applications can supply their own client without conflicting with auto-configuration.
Acceptance criteria
- Root
ActivityClientcan be injected without a qualifier. - Non-root clients can be selected by namespace/alias qualifier.
- Namespace-specific connections, converters, interceptors, and options customizers are applied correctly.
- Tests cover root and multiple non-root namespaces, customization, and application-provided clients.
- Documentation includes configuration, injection, and a standalone activity invocation example.
Breaking changes?
None intended. This adds Spring-managed clients for an existing SDK API.
Server PR
No additional server changes are expected for the Spring integration itself.
- Linguagem predominante
- Java
- Estrelas
- 441
- Forks
- 260
- Merge médio
- 5d 3h
- PRs com merge (30d)
- 19
Preparar o ambiente
- Sem Dockerfile nem arquivo Docker Compose
- Sem modelo de pull request
- Ler o guia de contribuição
Primeiros passos
- Leia a issue inteira e depois o guia de contribuição do projeto.
- Comente na issue dizendo que vai assumir — evita que duas pessoas façam o mesmo trabalho.
- Faça um fork do repositório e trabalhe em uma branch.
- Abra um pull request que referencie o número da issue.
Mais de temporalio/sdk-java
-
enhancement
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 65/100
temporalio/sdk-java#1825 ·
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 2 dias
-
Skipped mutableSideEffect leaks an empty RecordMarker command after a full replay, and the workflow task fails on every retryTalvez já em andamento @Quinn-With-Two-Ns assumiu há 7 dias. Aberta
Dificuldade 4/5 3-5 dias Facilidade para iniciantes 52/100
temporalio/sdk-java#3163 · 3 comentários · 1 responsável ·
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 2 dias
-
Proposal: handle SIGTERM by default to initiate graceful worker shutdownTalvez já em andamento @eamsden assumiu há 22 dias. Aberta
temporalio/sdk-java#3135 · 1 comentário · 1 responsável ·
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 2 dias
-
Skip result deserialization for local activities and SideEffect when not replaying (mutableSideEffect already does this)Talvez já em andamento @Quinn-With-Two-Ns assumiu há 17 dias. Abertaenhancement
Dificuldade 4/5 3-5 dias Facilidade para iniciantes 54/100
temporalio/sdk-java#3125 · 2 comentários · 1 responsável ·
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 2 dias
-
Skip input serialization for local activities when doNotIncludeArgumentsIntoMarker is setTalvez já em andamento @Quinn-With-Two-Ns assumiu há 17 dias. Abertaenhancement
Dificuldade 3/5 1-2 dias Facilidade para iniciantes 55/100
temporalio/sdk-java#3124 · 1 responsável ·
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 2 dias
Todas as issues de temporalio/sdk-java
Issues semelhantes
-
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 85/100
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia
-
documentation good first issue priority: low
Dificuldade 1/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 78/100
Gautam-aman/CODOVYN#52 ·
-
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 72/100
-
Dificuldade 1/5 Menos de uma hora Facilidade para iniciantes 85/100
ControlSystemStudio/phoebus#3998 ·
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia
-
bug/错误
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 64/100
FCL-Team/FoldCraftLauncher#1982 · 2 comentários ·
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia