Hacktoberfest 2026: as issues que os mantenedores marcaram para outubro, abertas e boas para iniciantes. Ver issues do Hacktoberfest

Performance issue when stepping through a deep callstack

Aberta
#760 4 comentários 0 reações 0 responsáveis Ver no GitHub

Ninguém assumiu esta issue ainda.

Avaliação

Dificuldade
4/5
Tempo estimado
3-5 dias
Facilidade para iniciantes
30/100
Tipo de issue
Bug
Clareza
Razoavelmente clara
Status de atividade
Estagnada
Stack de tecnologia
c, ruby
Domínio
devtools, performance

Direção de pesquisa

Start at ext/debug/debug.c lines 92-98 and inspect how rb_make_backtrace is used while stepping through a deep callstack. Compare the proposed rb_threadptr_backtrace_object and debase approaches, including their *_core.h requirements. Done means stepping through roughly 150 calls no longer incurs the reported slowdown and memory pressure.

Escrita pelo modelo de indexação a partir do texto da issue.

Descrição

Your environment

  • ruby -v: 2.7.2p137
  • rdbg -v: 1.6.2

Describe the bug
When stepping through with a deep callstack, the debugger becomes slower with each step.

To Reproduce
In a codebase which has a method that's ~150 calls deep in the stack, add a breakpoint, debug, and step through.

Expected behavior
It wouldn't be slow

Additional context
We are facing this issue at Stripe, and we tracked down the problem to: https://github.com/ruby/debug/blob/296daa6742e114395a4ce336b8721d48a6e5e52f/ext/debug/debug.c#L92-L98

This seems to be generating the full backtrace through rb_make_backtrace, just to then take the size. rb_make_backtrace (source) generates an array of strings each time it's called. Those strings end up not being used, and after a couple of iterations, you end up with a big memory footprint, which causes the GC to collect them, significantly slowing down the debugger.

Luckily, it looks like you are already aware that this is inefficient (given the // TODO: more efficient API) :)

Looking into alternatives, I came up with a couple of options (but open to any other ideas):

  1. Use rb_threadptr_backtrace_object to skip the formatting of the backtrace, saving some extra memory (but still generating more than necessary)
  2. debase solves this with a different approach: https://github.com/ruby-debug/debase/blob/5780803819f16190ce50ddfdad5775acf8f95fd1/ext/hacks.h#L26

Both of them, though, require the inclusion of *_core.h, which is not currently possible (debase solves it by using its own version of ruby_core_source)

Linguagem predominante
Ruby
Estrelas
1.3k
Forks
146
Métricas de merge de PRs
Nenhum PR com merge em 30d

Guia de contribuição

Abrir o guia de contribuição

Primeiros passos

  1. Leia a issue inteira e depois o guia de contribuição do projeto.
  2. Comente na issue dizendo que vai assumir — evita que duas pessoas façam o mesmo trabalho.
  3. Faça um fork do repositório e trabalhe em uma branch.
  4. Abra um pull request que referencie o número da issue.

Mais de ruby/debug

Todas as issues de ruby/debug

Issues semelhantes

Mais issues de Ruby

Receba novas issues na sua caixa de entrada

Um resumo curto de issues do GitHub para quem está começando.