Hacktoberfest 2026: as issues que os mantenedores marcaram para outubro, abertas e boas para iniciantes. Ver issues do Hacktoberfest

remote debugger failing on first hit with puma

Aberta
#1,121 6 comentários 0 reações 0 responsáveis Ver no GitHub

Ninguém assumiu esta issue ainda.

Avaliação

Dificuldade
4/5
Tempo estimado
3-5 dias
Facilidade para iniciantes
35/100
Tipo de issue
Bug
Clareza
Precisa de esclarecimento
Status de atividade
Estagnada
Stack de tecnologia
docker, ruby
Domínio
devtools

Direção de pesquisa

Start by reproducing the first-hit failure with Ruby 3.3.5, rdbg 1.9.2, Puma in a local Docker container, and the Sinatra request flow described. Inspect the remote debugger behavior around the initial SIGURG and step transition, including the reported Puma and Rack paths. Done means the first breakpoint can be stepped through normally without losing context.

Escrita pelo modelo de indexação a partir do texto da issue.

Descrição

Your environment

  • ruby -v: 3.3.5
  • rdbg -v: 1.9.2

Describe the bug
When hitting breakpoint via placing "debugger" into source code, and connecting with remote debugger, with sinatra controller and puma web server in local docker container, first time when "debugger" is hit will fail, as described below

For example,
Puma started freshly serving sinatra app in local docker container

    33|       def some_method_called_via_puma_via_sinatra_controller
=>  34|         debugger
    35|         some logic...
    37|       end
    38|
(rdbg:remote) n
# No sourcefile available for /usr/local/bundle/gems/puma-6.4.2/lib/puma/single.rb

Stop by SIGURG
(rdbg:remote) n
# it looks like it tries to step in code, but in reality context is lost
(rdbg:remote) n
[1, 7] in $(Gem)/rack-2.2.9/lib/rack/file.rb
     1| # frozen_string_literal: true
     2|
     3| require_relative 'files'
     4|
=>   5| module Rack
     6|   File = Files
     7| end
(rdbg:remote) c

Thus only way to end to proceed is to hit "continue", since control flow has jumped into some odd place, and now, after this failure when doing same request again, debugger works as espected (i.e. does not hit this "SIGURG" which seems to break thing).

Makes usage rather irritating since after every modify of code (and restart of web server thus), have to first hit debugger "cold", and failing, and hitting continue, and now it seems to be "hot", and can actually succeed.

To Reproduce

  • Local docker container
  • running sinatra app with puma on it
  • setting up remote debugger
  • adding breakpoint via placing "debugger" into code
  • launching app on container
  • performing some request hitting "debugger" put in code
  • connect remote debugger to process
    => fails on first time, if hitting continue, and retrying request it works as expected

Expected behavior
It would not fail on first time, since it makes debugging few cases difficult.

Additional context
Issue has been there for a while, i.e. it has had this failure always for me with this debug gem

Linguagem predominante
Ruby
Estrelas
1.3k
Forks
146
Métricas de merge de PRs
Nenhum PR com merge em 30d

Guia de contribuição

Abrir o guia de contribuição

Primeiros passos

  1. Leia a issue inteira e depois o guia de contribuição do projeto.
  2. Comente na issue dizendo que vai assumir — evita que duas pessoas façam o mesmo trabalho.
  3. Faça um fork do repositório e trabalhe em uma branch.
  4. Abra um pull request que referencie o número da issue.

Mais de ruby/debug

Todas as issues de ruby/debug

Issues semelhantes

Mais issues de Ruby

Receba novas issues na sua caixa de entrada

Um resumo curto de issues do GitHub para quem está começando.