remote debugger failing on first hit with puma
Ninguém assumiu esta issue ainda.
Avaliação
- Dificuldade
- 4/5
- Tempo estimado
- 3-5 dias
- Facilidade para iniciantes
- 35/100
Direção de pesquisa
Start by reproducing the first-hit failure with Ruby 3.3.5, rdbg 1.9.2, Puma in a local Docker container, and the Sinatra request flow described. Inspect the remote debugger behavior around the initial SIGURG and step transition, including the reported Puma and Rack paths. Done means the first breakpoint can be stepped through normally without losing context.
Escrita pelo modelo de indexação a partir do texto da issue.
Descrição
Your environment
ruby -v: 3.3.5rdbg -v: 1.9.2
Describe the bug
When hitting breakpoint via placing "debugger" into source code, and connecting with remote debugger, with sinatra controller and puma web server in local docker container, first time when "debugger" is hit will fail, as described below
For example,
Puma started freshly serving sinatra app in local docker container
33| def some_method_called_via_puma_via_sinatra_controller
=> 34| debugger
35| some logic...
37| end
38|
(rdbg:remote) n
# No sourcefile available for /usr/local/bundle/gems/puma-6.4.2/lib/puma/single.rb
Stop by SIGURG
(rdbg:remote) n
# it looks like it tries to step in code, but in reality context is lost
(rdbg:remote) n
[1, 7] in $(Gem)/rack-2.2.9/lib/rack/file.rb
1| # frozen_string_literal: true
2|
3| require_relative 'files'
4|
=> 5| module Rack
6| File = Files
7| end
(rdbg:remote) c
Thus only way to end to proceed is to hit "continue", since control flow has jumped into some odd place, and now, after this failure when doing same request again, debugger works as espected (i.e. does not hit this "SIGURG" which seems to break thing).
Makes usage rather irritating since after every modify of code (and restart of web server thus), have to first hit debugger "cold", and failing, and hitting continue, and now it seems to be "hot", and can actually succeed.
To Reproduce
- Local docker container
- running sinatra app with puma on it
- setting up remote debugger
- adding breakpoint via placing "debugger" into code
- launching app on container
- performing some request hitting "debugger" put in code
- connect remote debugger to process
=> fails on first time, if hitting continue, and retrying request it works as expected
Expected behavior
It would not fail on first time, since it makes debugging few cases difficult.
Additional context
Issue has been there for a while, i.e. it has had this failure always for me with this debug gem
- Linguagem predominante
- Ruby
- Estrelas
- 1.3k
- Forks
- 146
- Métricas de merge de PRs
- Nenhum PR com merge em 30d
Guia de contribuição
Primeiros passos
- Leia a issue inteira e depois o guia de contribuição do projeto.
- Comente na issue dizendo que vai assumir — evita que duas pessoas façam o mesmo trabalho.
- Faça um fork do repositório e trabalhe em uma branch.
- Abra um pull request que referencie o número da issue.
Mais de ruby/debug
-
Dificuldade 3/5 1-2 dias Facilidade para iniciantes 68/100
-
Support exceptionOptions in setExceptionBreakpoints to catch arbitrary exception classes via DAP Aberta
Dificuldade 4/5 3-5 dias Facilidade para iniciantes 55/100
-
Dificuldade 3/5 1-2 dias Facilidade para iniciantes 45/100
-
Dificuldade 4/5 3-5 dias Facilidade para iniciantes 52/100
-
Dificuldade 4/5 3-5 dias Facilidade para iniciantes 35/100
Issues semelhantes
-
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 70/100
-
bug
Dificuldade 1/5 Menos de uma hora Facilidade para iniciantes 90/100
riscv/riscv-unified-db#2626 ·
-
Component: GLib
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 70/100
-
ds-drift
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 70/100
we-promise/sure#3693 ·
-
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 75/100
simp/pupmod-simp-simp#395 ·