Hacktoberfest 2026: as issues que os mantenedores marcaram para outubro, abertas e boas para iniciantes. Ver issues do Hacktoberfest

zlib: one-shot gzip()/deflate() results accumulate in arrayBuffers until OOM — GC never prompted (regression in v24.15.0)

Aberta
#65,600 0 comentários 0 reações 0 responsáveis Ver no GitHub

Ninguém assumiu esta issue ainda.

Avaliação

Dificuldade
4/5
Tempo estimado
3-5 dias
Facilidade para iniciantes
58/100
Tipo de issue
Bug
Clareza
Razoavelmente clara
Status de atividade
Ativa
Stack de tecnologia
javascript, node.js
Domínio
backend, performance

Direção de pesquisa

Comece executando repro.js com as versões afetadas e limpas do Node.js; em seguida, inspecione o caminho zlib one-shot e os quatro commits de #61717 listados na issue. Rastreie como as alocações concluídas são reportadas ao V8 e verifique se o fix restaura a pressão do GC sem afetar as classes de stream; a reprodução deve parar de acumular arrayBuffers sem GC forçado.

Escrita pelo modelo de indexação a partir do texto da issue.

Descrição

Version

v24.15.0 through v24.20.0 (first bad release: v24.15.0; still present on v24.19.0 and v24.20.0, the latest 24.x at time of filing). Confirmed clean: v22.12.0, v22.22.0, v24.0.0, v24.13.0, v24.14.0.

Platform
Darwin 25.5.0 arm64

Also reproduced in production on Linux x64 (containerized, cgroup v2) — that is where we hit OOMKills.

Subsystem

zlib

What steps will reproduce the bug?

Call the one-shot convenience API (zlib.gzip()zlib.deflate() behaves identically) in a loop and watch process.memoryUsage().arrayBuffers. No dependencies — save as repro.js:

"use strict";
// One-shot zlib.gzip() in a loop; watch process.memoryUsage().arrayBuffers.
// Run:            node repro.js
// With forced GC: FORCE_GC=1 node --expose-gc repro.js
const zlib = require("node:zlib");

const N = 2000;
// ~120 KB compressible payload (repeating structured JSON)
const chunk = Buffer.from(
  JSON.stringify({ resourceSpans: [{ scopeSpans: [{ spans: [{ name: "POST /x", attrs: { a: 1 } }] }] }] }),
);
const payload = Buffer.concat(Array(Math.ceil((120 * 1024) / chunk.length)).fill(chunk));

const mb = (x) => (x / 1048576).toFixed(1);
function sample(label) {
  if (process.env.FORCE_GC === "1" && global.gc) global.gc();
  const m = process.memoryUsage();
  console.log(
    `${label}\theapUsed=${mb(m.heapUsed)}\texternal=${mb(m.external)}\tarrayBuffers=${mb(m.arrayBuffers)}`,
  );
}

console.log(`node=${process.version} force_gc=${process.env.FORCE_GC === "1"}`);
sample("start");
let i = 0;
(function loop() {
  if (i >= N) return setTimeout(() => sample("end"), 200);
  i++;
  if (i % 500 === 0) sample(`i=${i}`);
  zlib.gzip(payload, (err) => {
    if (err) throw err;
    loop();
  });
})();
How often does it reproduce? Is there a required condition?

Every run, immediately. Two conditions:

  1. The one-shot API (zlib.gzip, zlib.deflate, …). The stream classes are NOT affected — a loop creating a createGunzip() stream per message stays flat, presumably because Close() frees native state deterministically.
  2. A JS heap comfortable enough that V8 does not run major GCs on its own. That is exactly the production steady state of a typical server: our pods sat at ~150 MiB heapUsed against a 432 MiB old-space limit, so nothing ever collected the dead results.
What is the expected behavior? Why is that the expected behavior?

The memory retained by completed one-shot calls should count as GC pressure, so V8 collects the dead result buffers before they accumulate meaningfully. That is what every release up to and including v24.14.0 does — the same loop is flat (sawtooths back down without any forced GC):

=== v24.14.0 ===
node=v24.14.0 force_gc=false
start	heapUsed=3.9	external=1.5	arrayBuffers=0.1
i=500	heapUsed=4.2	external=1.7	arrayBuffers=0.4
i=1000	heapUsed=4.4	external=2.1	arrayBuffers=0.7
i=1500	heapUsed=4.5	external=2.2	arrayBuffers=0.8
i=2000	heapUsed=4.2	external=1.7	arrayBuffers=0.3
end	heapUsed=4.3	external=1.7	arrayBuffers=0.3
What do you see instead?

From v24.15.0 on, arrayBuffers grows linearly with the number of calls and never comes back down:

=== v24.20.0 ===
node=v24.20.0 force_gc=false
start	heapUsed=4.2	external=1.9	arrayBuffers=0.3
i=500	heapUsed=5.2	external=12.2	arrayBuffers=10.6
i=1000	heapUsed=6.9	external=22.6	arrayBuffers=21.0
i=1500	heapUsed=7.2	external=33.1	arrayBuffers=31.4
i=2000	heapUsed=8.5	external=43.5	arrayBuffers=41.9
end	heapUsed=8.5	external=43.5	arrayBuffers=41.9

End-state arrayBuffers across versions (same script, 2000 iterations):

version end arrayBuffers
v22.12.0 2.7 MiB ✅
v24.14.0 0.3 MiB ✅
v24.15.0 31.5 MiB ❌
v24.19.0 41.9 MiB ❌
v24.20.0 41.9 MiB ❌

The buffers are not unreclaimable: with FORCE_GC=1 node --expose-gc repro.js every affected version ends at ~0.3 MiB. The memory is ordinary garbage that nothing ever prompts V8 to collect — which is why the growth is unbounded in a long-running server whose heap is otherwise comfortable.

Growth granularity is the compressed output rounded up to the 16 KB default chunkSize: this compressible 120 KB payload leaks ~16 KB/call; a 16 KB random (incompressible) payload leaks ~31 KB/call; 64 KB random leaks ~94 KB/call.

Additional information

Release-level bisect points at v24.15.0, and the only zlib change in that release is #61717 ("src: refactor compression allocation tracking, enable for zstd"), i.e. commits bef661f182, 3c8f700fd7, 94dbb36d4d, e8079a8297. The behavior is consistent with the one-shot path's retained allocations no longer being reported to V8's external-memory GC-pressure accounting after that refactor.

Real-world impact: @grpc/grpc-js runs zlib.gzip(message, cb) once per outgoing message when compression is enabled (compression-filter.js), so any service exporting OpenTelemetry traces over OTLP/gRPC with CompressionAlgorithm.GZIP leaks per export. After upgrading a production service from Node 22.12 to 24.19 with no dependency changes, its pods accumulated arrayBuffers at ~3 MiB/min and were OOMKilled roughly every 90 minutes; heapUsed stayed flat the whole time. Disabling exporter compression fully mitigates it.

Searched for existing reports before filing: the closest hits are the Blob.stream()/CompressionStream RSS leaks (#64105, #63574, #63708), but those leak RSS rather than arrayBuffers, begin at v24.16 or v26, and are not reclaimed the same way — this one starts exactly at v24.15.0, is fully reclaimed by forced GC, and needs only plain zlib.gzip().

Linguagem predominante
JavaScript
Estrelas
122k
Forks
37.4k
Merge médio
4d 2h
PRs com merge (30d)
277

Guia de contribuição

Abrir o guia de contribuição

Primeiros passos

  1. Leia a issue inteira e depois o guia de contribuição do projeto.
  2. Comente na issue dizendo que vai assumir — evita que duas pessoas façam o mesmo trabalho.
  3. Faça um fork do repositório e trabalhe em uma branch.
  4. Abra um pull request que referencie o número da issue.

Mais de nodejs/node

Todas as issues de nodejs/node

Issues semelhantes

Mais issues de JavaScript

Receba novas issues na sua caixa de entrada

Um resumo curto de issues do GitHub para quem está começando.